INTA past, present and the future
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

INTA past, present and the future

At yesterday’s Opening Ceremony, outgoing Executive Director Alan Drewsen said goodbye, while President Toe Su Aung highlighted INTA’s achievements and laid out plans to continue INTA’s push to strengthen its international presence and to tackle Internet infringement

One of these achievements was the large number of countries acceding to the Madrid Protocol in the past year, with Colombia, India and Mexico joining the fold. Not only did INTA play a major role in working with these jurisdictions in implementing the Protocol, these successes have drawn interest from other countries as well.

“All this activity has fueled regional interest in the Madrid Protocol, and we are now working with Brazil, Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic as they take steps that could lead to their own accession,” she said.

Aung also discussed INTA’s growing focus on emerging economies. She pointed to the ‘Africa Rising’ initiative as well as INTA’s strengthening relationship with African regional organizations as important progress in advancing trademark rights there. She also expressed optimism about the organization’s work in Myanmar as it sets out to draft its first trademark law.

In addition, Aung spoke of the need to expand INTA’s work to protect trademark rights online. She cited the public opposition to ACTA, SOPA, and PIPA as evidence of continuing public misconceptions about the relationship between IP protection and Internet freedom.

“We must explain the benefits of protecting trademarks online, so that the public can be confident and informed Internet users,” she said. Despite these challenges, there have been successes in this realm, such as the work with ICANN on improving trademark protections for the new gTLDs being rolled out.

A goodbye of sorts

The Opening Ceremony also featured a speech from Alan Drewsen, INTA’s outgoing Executive Director. Drewsen took the opportunity to thank the many individuals that he worked with during his 15-year tenure. Drewsen was proud of INTA’s growth and achievements under his watch but also expressed humility and gratitude for the contribution of his colleagues.

“I leave with the feeling that I have done a good job for you, but with the profounder emotion that for so many reasons it is all of you that I have to thank.” Though Drewsen is stepping down, you may see him again at INTA Annual Meetings. On Saturday, the Board of Directors passed a resolution granting him honorary membership.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Gift this article