Huawei readies for FTC complaint against InterDigital

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Huawei readies for FTC complaint against InterDigital

Chinese telecoms firm Huawei is set to complain to the US antitrust watchdog the FTC about InterDigital’s patent practices

Yesterday the US International Trade Commission (ITC) announced that it would investigate a complaint lodged by US non-practising entity InterDigital against telecoms companies Huawei, Samsung, Nokia and ZTE. In doing so, it rejected a request from Samsung and Huawei to delay proceedings while the US courts considered the dispute.

In its January 2 complaint, InterDigital accused the companies of infringing its patent rights in a series of smartphone and computer devices with wireless technologies and asked the ITC to stop the products being imported into the country.

InterDigital’s action is part of a long-running dispute with telecoms companies in the US and Europe.

Now Huawei’s chief legal officer, Song Liuping, has told Managing IP that the company plans to complain to the Federal Trade Commission about InterDigital’s licensing practices. But he declined to reveal when it would make its complaint.

Song compared the use of competition rules in China with those overseas.“There are many IP antitrust cases in the EU and the US to restrict the misuse of monopoly power. There are similar legal stipulations in China but far fewer cases,” he said.

In May last year, Huawei filed a complaint against InterDigital with the European Commission, alleging that the company had been trying to leverage its declared 3G standard essential patents to force Huawei to conclude a discriminatory, unfair and exploitative licence in breach of FRAND licensing practices.

InterDigital is being advised by Latham & Watkins in the US. Covington & Burling is acting for Huawei.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Firm says appointment of Nick McDonald will boost its expertise in cross-border disputes, including at the Unified Patent Court
In the final episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the IP Inclusive Charter and the senior leaders’ pledge
Gift this article