Huawei readies for FTC complaint against InterDigital

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Huawei readies for FTC complaint against InterDigital

Chinese telecoms firm Huawei is set to complain to the US antitrust watchdog the FTC about InterDigital’s patent practices

Yesterday the US International Trade Commission (ITC) announced that it would investigate a complaint lodged by US non-practising entity InterDigital against telecoms companies Huawei, Samsung, Nokia and ZTE. In doing so, it rejected a request from Samsung and Huawei to delay proceedings while the US courts considered the dispute.

In its January 2 complaint, InterDigital accused the companies of infringing its patent rights in a series of smartphone and computer devices with wireless technologies and asked the ITC to stop the products being imported into the country.

InterDigital’s action is part of a long-running dispute with telecoms companies in the US and Europe.

Now Huawei’s chief legal officer, Song Liuping, has told Managing IP that the company plans to complain to the Federal Trade Commission about InterDigital’s licensing practices. But he declined to reveal when it would make its complaint.

Song compared the use of competition rules in China with those overseas.“There are many IP antitrust cases in the EU and the US to restrict the misuse of monopoly power. There are similar legal stipulations in China but far fewer cases,” he said.

In May last year, Huawei filed a complaint against InterDigital with the European Commission, alleging that the company had been trying to leverage its declared 3G standard essential patents to force Huawei to conclude a discriminatory, unfair and exploitative licence in breach of FRAND licensing practices.

InterDigital is being advised by Latham & Watkins in the US. Covington & Burling is acting for Huawei.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article