Ralph Lauren defeated in .polo gTLD case
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ralph Lauren defeated in .polo gTLD case

An ICC arbitrator has upheld an objection filed by the US Polo Association against Ralph Lauren’s application for a top-level domain for .polo, in a decision that is likely to alarm famous brand owners

In a ruling dated October 10, Burkhard Hess upheld the USPA’s community-based objection. He found that it had “persuasively proven that damage for a significant portion of the community it represents would result should the Applicant be granted the applied-for ‘.polo’ string”.

USPA brought the objection as a representative of the global polo sports community. Other polo clubs in the US and other countries supported it, leading the panellist to conclude that there is “substantial opposition within the polo sports community”.

Hess also found that polo sports is a “clearly delineated community” and said the fact that USPA did not object to the application in the public comment period did not preclude the filing of a community objection.

Moreover, he found that if Ralph Lauren’s application were approved, the polo sports community would see its internet presence severely affected, resulting in economic damage, and that potential sponsors would be discouraged from sponsoring activities, which could lead to further economic loss.

Hess specifically mentioned Icann’s recent decision to suspend the evaluation of more than 90 applications for generic or dictionary words as gTLDs and in particular the GAC recommendation to disallow the application for the .amazon string.

Brian Beckham, head of legal policy at Valideus, told Managing IP: “It will trouble trade mark owners to see that the panel seemed to disregard the applicant’s globally famous trade mark rights and no kind of positive defence such as legitimate co-existence seems to have been considered.”

He added that the finding raises concerns for applicants for brand gTLDs in current and future rounds: “You might apply to avoid what’s been called permanent string preclusion, and find at the very last minute that the rug has been pulled from under you.”

There is no formal process to appeal community objection decisions under Icann’s procedures. However, Ralph Lauren may be able to take other action, for example in court.

The USPA was represented by Gerald J Ferguson of Baker & Hostetler and Ralph Lauren by Andrea L Calvaruso of Kelley Drye & Warren.

ICC panellists have also so far issued determinations regarding applications for .architect, .fly, .gay and .shop. Many other community objections have been filed, and decisions are expected soon.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Gift this article