Google and Amazon lead applicants for new gTLDs

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Google and Amazon lead applicants for new gTLDs

Google and Amazon are leading the way in applications for new gTLDs, according to a list of the 1,930 applications published today by Icann

Unveiling the list in London, Icann president and CEO Rod Beckstrom described it as “an historic day” adding: “The internet is about to change forever. A powerful change is coming.”

The 1,930 applications include 66 community applications and 116 internationalised domain names. There are 911 applications from North America, 675 from Europe, 303 from Asia, 24 from Latin America and 17 from Africa.

However, there will not be 1,930 new gTLDs at the end of the process as many applications are for the same string. There are 13 applications for .app for example and multiple applications for common suffixes such as .inc, .llc and .llp.

All of the applications will have to undergo extensive review, including for IP conflicts, in batches. Icann vice president Kurt Pritz said the first applications would probably be live towards the end of the first quarter of 2013.

Pritz also said that “Icann encourages accommodation” where there is more than one legitimate applicant for a string. Amazon and Google will be fighting each other (among other applicants) over .movie, .cloud and .book, for example.

Amazon has filed a total of 76 applications through its Luxembourg subsidiary, while Google has filed 100 using the name Charleston Road Registry.

One observer told Managing IP that it is likely that big applicants will trade applications so they can get those they really want.

Brand owners in the pharmaceutical, automobile and financial services industries are prominent in the list, while retailers and consumer goods are less so. Many of the world’s most famous brands are not represented, including Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Marlboro and Nescafe.

Many high-tech companies have applied for their brands, but the three big players in social media – Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter – have not. Apple has applied for .apple but not .iphone, .ipod, .itunes or .icloud.

Brand owners have been generally critical of the expansion of the gTLD system, calling it unnecessary and expensive. One brand owner told Managing IP today: “This is the next step in the privatisation of the internet.”

But at first glance they are among the winners from the programme so far. Most brand applicants will get the gTLD they want, as there appear to be few contested brand applications and none from cybersquatters. Some contests that do appear are for .guardian and .live (where Microsoft is competing with Google).

There may also be some brand applications such as .lincoln and .nationwide that are opposed by other interest groups.

The big challenge for rights owners comes from now on, as they seek to ensure protection at the second level. Jonathan Robinson, who is advising Afilias, said today: “This is virgin internet real estate that needs to be watched pretty closely”.

Beckstrom said that Icann had worked hard to protect rights owners, putting in place seven new mechanisms in addition to the two already existing.

In answer to a question from Managing IP, Pritz said that the Trademark Clearinghouse will be running by October, and brand owners will be able to register their marks then. A session on how the Clearinghouse will work is planned for Icann’s conference in Prague at the end of this month.

But Pritz admitted that more work needs to be done on the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS), as providers had so far been unable to commit to offering it in a cost-effective way. However, he said he was confident that a solution would be found by the first quarter of next year.

Robinson told Managing IP there is “room to improve and develop rights protection mechanisms” and urged rights owners to play a part in the process.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Gift this article