China trade marks: Special campaign on protection of Disney trade marks
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China trade marks: Special campaign on protection of Disney trade marks

On October 15, the national authority in China responsible for administrative enforcement of trade marks, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC), issued a notice announcing an unusual year-long campaign to provide special trade mark protection to the Walt Disney Company.

The SAIC notice states that the campaign has been initiated to protect the opening and future development of the Shanghai Disney Resort, to protect the interests of Chinese consumers and to "uphold China's international image for safeguarding intellectual property rights".

The campaign is being launched as Disney enters into the homestretch towards the planned opening in spring 2016 of its $5.5 billion theme park. Disney is a minority investor in the resort, with 57% of the park owned by a group of companies controlled by the city government of Shanghai.

The contents of the campaign are not entirely unprecedented, as similar initiatives are pursued from time to time for special events, such as the Olympic Games or where public health and safety are threatened. But the focus of this new campaign is unusual in that it focuses on a sole brand owner, Disney.

Highlights of the campaign are summarised below.

Protection zones

The SAIC notice provides for the creation of a "key trade mark protection zone" covering approximately seven square kilometres surrounding the Shanghai Disney Resort. Within the zone, enforcement efforts by local Administrations for Industry and Commerce (AICs) will be significantly increased to "comprehensively eliminate" Disney trade mark infringement.

In addition, the special campaign will establish "coordinated protection zones" in other areas of Shanghai and northeast China in conjunction with local AICs and market supervision bureaux (MSBs) to increase local enforcement efforts and develop cross-border information and evidence-sharing practices.

Special "emergency teams" are to be formed within designated zones to provide swift resolution of trade mark enforcement actions undertaken during the special campaign. (Just how these teams differ from existing AIC and MSB raid teams remains to be seen.)

National collective rectification

In addition to these protection zones, the SAIC notice also calls for local enforcement agencies nationwide to carry out "collective rectification" against local infringers for a period of one year following the opening of the Shanghai Disney Resort. The focus of these efforts appear targeted on production, with emphasis given to areas where fake goods are produced, where trade marks are printed and where wholesale distribution is conducted.

The SAIC notice also encourages authorities in medium and large cities nationwide, as well as popular tourist cities, to liaise closely with the Shanghai AIC to strengthen enforcement and "narrow the space for criminal elements to carry out activities infringing on Disney's registered trade marks".

Online enforcement

The SAIC notice calls for "major internet platforms" to establish "Disney trade mark protection mechanisms" to crack down on large scale infringement of Disney marks online. The notice does not otherwise suggest a particular role for local AICs in online monitoring or enforcement – a long-standing gap in China's current enforcement regime.

Training and public awareness

The SAIC notice states that the SAIC will organise training for provincial-level AICs and MSBs to boost their knowledge of Disney brands and the implementation measures for the special campaign. Local AICs and MSBs are also required to strengthen public awareness of Disney trade marks through seminars, training, media briefings and other activities carried out through the course of the campaign.

Reporting

Provincial-level AICs and MSBs are required to file a report to the SAIC of their enforcement results by November 2016.

Relevance to other IP owners?

No doubt other foreign and local IP owners suffering from extreme levels of counterfeiting in China will cite the SAIC Notice in their future efforts to press the SAIC and local AICs for more systematic measures for protecting their rights. But few foreign companies have a major city government as their joint venture partner.

SIPS Hong Kong

Lockhart Road No 3

Wanchai, Hong Kong

China

mail@sips.asia

Tel: +852 2866 6400

Fax: +852 2866 6408

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A majority of clients – particularly high-earning businesses – want advisers with demonstrable social credentials, according to a survey of more than 28,000 corporate counsel
The US Supreme Court’s ruling in Warner Chappell Music v Nealy is a boost for certain copyright plaintiffs, but some counsel wonder if the court addressed the right question
Private equity firm Adamantem Capital leads the race to acquire Australia-based intellectual property business Qantm IP
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel at four firms reveal how they supervise associates on pro bono matters and what kind of volunteer work their attorneys do
Kramer Levin litigators explain how they secured victory for their client against Microsoft subsidiary Activision in a dispute concerning the video game ‘Call of Duty’
Steven Cooper, partner at Ware Fressola Maguire & Barber, explains what sponsoring Brand Action means for his firm and why the IP community is well-placed to help
Tilman Müller-Stoy reveals why he never made it as a footballer and how he could have had an alternative career as a fire juggler
As the UPC approaches its first anniversary, there’s a risk that persisting teething issues will continue to be the major pain points
Justin Davidson and Stanley Ng of Norton Rose Fulbright discuss what China’s recent Ultraman ruling does and doesn’t say about who is responsible when an AI system infringes copyright
Gift this article