Brazil: How does the EU’s new Copyright Directive compare with Brazilian law?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: How does the EU’s new Copyright Directive compare with Brazilian law?

On March 26 2019, the European Parliament voted in favour of the new EU Copyright Directive for the digital single market. As 73% of young European internet users listen to music, watch TV series and films or play games online, one of the Copyright Directive's changes concerns how online content sharing services should deal with copyrighted content.

Now, platforms that rely on user-uploaded content are required to obtain an authorisation from rights holders to make copyrighted content available to the public.

In the absence of a deal, online content-sharing service providers may be held liable for unauthorised acts of communication to the public of copyright-protected works, unless they are able to demonstrate that they have made a real effort to obtain a licence and acted expeditiously to stop users from accessing unauthorised content. Online platforms of more than three years and with an annual turnover over EUR 10 million must also make best efforts to prevent future uploads of the notified works.

In Brazil, Law 12,965/14 stipulates that internet providers can only be held liable for damages resulting from content generated by third parties if, after a specific court order, they do not take any steps to make the infringing content unavailable in a timely manner.

However, this liability exemption depends on a specific legal provision, which so far has not been enacted. Accordingly, Brazilian courts have steadily been applying Brazilian Copyright Law and dismissing copyright infringement claims if, after communication, the internet provider has removed the infringing content from its platform or blocked access to it.

As seen with the EU's GDPR and a similar Brazilian law approved in August 2018, European laws can influence Brazilian policy. As a result, considering the fast-growing consumption of online content by Brazilians, it is very important to follow closely any discussions generated by Article 17 of the new EU Copyright Directive in Brazil and to consider how it may impact Brazilian lawmakers.

Daniel Law

Antonio Curvello

Daniel Legal & IP Strategy

Av. República do Chile, 230, 3rd Floor

Centro, Rio de Janeiro

20031-170, Brazil

Tel: +55 21 2102 4212

www.daniel-ip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article