Advice and anecdotes on protecting IP in China
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Advice and anecdotes on protecting IP in China

At Managing IP’s International Patent Forum in London in March, panellists gave colourful examples of how foreign companies can go about protecting their IP in China



Think China, and IP protection is not the first thing that comes to mind. While China has historically had a bad reputation protecting IP, panellists at the International Patent Forum in London highlighted some of the improvements made in the country to ensure foreign companies get a fair deal.


Stephan Wolke, head of IP and services at industrial engineering company ThyssenKrupp in Essen, Germany, provided some rather comedic examples of how he went about fighting for his company’s rights.

In 2001, ThyssenKrupp delivered a product to the International Airport in San Francisco. The company did not think of filing a patent immediately and instead made the product and the operating manual available in public records in California. Several years later a Chinese company took the product, patented it in China, and then counter sued ThyssenKrupp for using its own product.

 “It wasn’t funny anymore”, said Wolke.

He then took the Chinese firm to court showing that the technology was public knowledge as clearly illustrated in the drawings and outline in the Californian manual. The case, which began in 2011 (10 years after the product was delivered), was finally decided in ThyssenKrupp’s favour in 2016. This highlights that with enough grit and determination, European companies can bring cases to court and get fair rulings if they show they have all their ducks in a row. 

Finally, Wolke noted that there are significant savings involved if the company is considered high-tech. “You have to have a certain amount of people in R&D and a certain amount of patents.” If a company is registered in China and has at least 10% of its personnel involved in technologically related activities, the company can receive a 15% corporate tax concession.

Also speaking in the session was Andy Bartlett, divisional director of patents at the UKIPO, spoke of the relatively short history of the IP framework in China. “China had no system at all in the early 1980s, including enforcement regime. So in that 35-year period they have introduced initial intellectual property laws.”

With China having a more robust IP enforcement system in place now, more companies are going to court to protect their assets. Domestic companies are using the system to sue each other for infringement, with foreign-brought cases representing just 1.5% of all cases, Bartlett said.

“With so few cases the courts have the incentive to get the rulings right,” said Bartlett. He added that where there is wilful infringement of IP, the damages can increase 500%.

The third speaker was David Lambourne, head of IP at UK-based Morgan Advanced Materials, a global manufacturer of specialist products. He began by advising those looking to protect their IP in China to get on a plane and meet with people. He said: “One of the most beneficial things is jumping on a plane and talking to the IP providers. Talk to government services, and most importantly, road test a hypothetical with them.”

The panellists concluded that China has made significant strides in IP protection over the last 35 years. Managing IP reported in 2017 that foreign-based companies had a win rate of 80% in patent litigation trials. While the judicial system in China may still be in a fledgling state, increased domestic demand for protection has driven the need for more improvements in the judicial system. While far from perfect, the system is much better than it was.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A 36-member team from Zhong Lun Law Firm, including six partners, will join the newly formed East IP Group
The Delhi High Court sided with Ericsson against Indian smartphone maker Lava, bringing the companies' nine-year dispute to a close
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Tennessee has passed the ELVIS Act, a law that fights against AI models that mimic the voice and likeness of music artists
Rob Stien, chief communications and public policy officer at InterDigital, says the EU has forgotten innovators while trying to solve an issue that doesn’t exist
As Australia’s Qantm IP leans towards being acquired by a private equity company, sources discuss what it could mean for IP firms
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
Nghiem Xuan Bac Pham, managing partner of Vision & Associates, discusses opportunities created by the US-China rift as well as profitability issues facing IP practices
Douglas Leite and two of his colleagues were intrigued by Bhering Advogados’s mission to grow its patent litigation practice
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Gift this article