EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal rules on principles of claim interpretation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal rules on principles of claim interpretation

Sponsored by

inspicos-400px recrop.jpg
Patent agreement document

Jakob Pade Frederiksen of Inspicos analyses a ruling confirming that patent claims must be interpreted with reference to the description and drawings

In decision G 1/24 of June 18 2025, the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO addressed a significant issue with regard to principles of claim interpretation. The ruling arose from a referral by a technical board of appeal of the EPO, T 439/22 of June 24 2024, in which the referring board noted that diverging lines of EPO case law with respect to claim interpretation had developed over the years.

A fundamental principle of patent law, as reflected in Article 69 of the European Patent Convention (EPC), is that the scope of protection conferred by a patent shall be determined by the claims. Article 69 of the EPC, however, additionally provides that the description and drawings shall be used to interpret the claims.

In application of Article 69 of the EPC, courts in Europe, including the Unified Patent Court (UPC), generally refer to the description when interpreting claims for both infringement and invalidity assessments.

As noted by the referring board in T 439/22, a line of EPO case law has, however, developed, following which claims should be interpreted on their own merits without regard to the description in the context of the assessment of novelty, inventive step, sufficiency of disclosure, and added subject matter. In contrast to that line of decisions, an alternative line of case law has held that the terms of claims should be given their normal meaning in the relevant art unless the description gives the terms a special meaning, thus implying that the description can be relied upon in the context of claim construction.

Primarily following the latter line of case law, the Enlarged Board of Appeal has now decided in G 1/24 that, while the claims are the starting point and the basis for assessing the patentability of an invention, the description and drawings shall always be consulted to interpret the claims when assessing the patentability. The decision is seen by many as an important step towards harmonisation between UPC and EPO case law.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A new foundation in Chile is giving women in the IP community the mentorship, and visibility they’ve long lacked
The EUIPO is keen to stress the benefits of mediation as a means of resolving IP disputes, but do roadblocks remain?
Åsa Gustafson, global patent paralegal manager at Zacco, provides insight into the world of a paralegal, explains how she keeps abreast of legal developments, and reveals a passion for weaving
Alif Gultom and Andrew Diamond of Januar Jahja and Partners explain why Indonesia must adopt reforms against bad-faith filings and safeguard its trademark system for the future
In the third episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the ‘Women in IP’ network and the current state of diversity within the profession
Practitioners, including two ex USPTO directors, say the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act could restore clarity and predictability to US patent law, though concerns remain
News of an alliance between two Malaysian law firms and the launch of a self-help video aimed at supporting IP professionals through menopause were also among the top talking points
Speakers at the EUIPO’s IP Mediation Conference discussed how lawyers can act in tandem with clients during mediation, and the importance of showing a united front
A report that revealed top legal LinkedIn influencers are generating hundreds of thousands in advertising value is the push lawyers need to up their social media presence
Speakers at the EUIPO’s Mediation Conference say mediation can offer a ‘cathartic’ and effective alternative to litigation that IP owners should consider
Gift this article