Myanmar sets effective date of the Trademark Law

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Myanmar sets effective date of the Trademark Law

Sponsored by

tillekegibbins.png
fireworks-1822479.jpg

Foreign investment in Myanmar is expected to receive a boost as a result of changes to the country’s trademark application process, report Khin Myo Myo Aye and Khin Yadanar Htay of Tilleke & Gibbins

Myanmar’s State Administration Council has specified the enforcement date of the country’s 2019 Trademark Law as April 1 2023, confirming a recent announcement from Myanmar’s Intellectual Property Department (IPD) to certified trademark representatives in the country.

The official public announcement came in Notification No. 82/2023, which was dated March 10 2023, and was published in the government-owned daily newspaper the following day.

The planned next step is the promulgation of the Trademark Rules to establish substantive procedures on trademark-related matters for trademark applications under the new system. The rules, which are necessary to establish procedures for collecting official fees, are expected to be issued in March 2023. Once the Trademark Rules are established and the Trademark Law comes into force, the second phase of the IPD’s ‘soft opening’ period will commence, which is expected to occur on April 3 2023, if there are no further changes.

In this second phase, mark owners can pay the official fees for trademark applications filed within the first phase of the soft opening. According to IPD officials, marks recorded under Myanmar’s old system or used in the country can still be filed together with payment during the soft opening’s second phase, either in person by the mark owner or through a certified representative via the online system. Even if a previously recorded mark is registered after April 1 2023, the application during the second phase can still reserve the earliest possible filing date under the new first-to-file system.

This second phase will continue until the ‘grand opening’ of the IPD, unless officials make further announcements to the contrary. IPD officials have confirmed that the earliest possible filing date under the new system will be the date of the IPD’s grand opening. In light of the ongoing and planned developments, the grand opening is expected to occur within 2023.

Considerations

This news of the commencement of the Trademark Law has been long awaited, and it represents a milestone in the modernisation of Myanmar’s legal landscape for intellectual property. The law provides a comprehensive legal framework for trademark protection in Myanmar and is expected to boost foreign investment in the country. It also aligns with international standards and practices, making it easier for businesses to navigate the trademark registration process.

With this development, it is essential for owners of existing marks in Myanmar and owners of new marks to develop their strategies for protecting their marks under the Trademark Law by registering them with the IPD. Businesses should assess their existing trademarks and file applications for registration as soon as possible to avoid potential infringement issues. Additionally, trademark owners should keep an eye out for the release of the Trademark Rules to gain a better understanding of the registration process and associated fees.

By acting promptly in response to these developments, brand owners can secure the earliest filing date possible and claim the statutory rights awarded in the 2019 Trademark Law.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Vivien Chan joins us for our ‘Women in IP’ series to discuss gender bias in the legal profession and why the business model followed by law firms leaves little room for women leaders
Partner Jeremy Hertzog explains how his team worked through a huge amount of disclosure from Adidas and what victory means for the firm
Evarist Kameja and Hadija Juma at Bowmans explain why a new law in Tanzania marks a significant shift in IP enforcement
In the wake of controversy surrounding Banksy’s recent London mural, AJ Park’s Thomas Huthwaite and Eloise Calder delve into the challenges street artists face in protecting their works and rights
Alex Levkin, founder of IPNote, discusses reshaping the filing industry through legal tech, and why practitioners’ advice should stretch beyond immediate legal needs
Cohausz & Florack, together with Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben, has taken action against Amazon on behalf of three VIA LA licensors
In the fourth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss unconscious bias in the IP workplace and how to address it
Greg Munt, who has moved from Griffith Hack to James & Wells after four decades, hails his new firm’s approach to client service
Practitioners warn that closing the Denver regional office could trigger a domino effect, threatening local innovation and access to IP resources
Law firms are rethinking litigation strategies after USPTO director John Squires said he would take control of PTAB challenges
Gift this article