Monthly report: February 2023’s exclusive content

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Monthly report: February 2023’s exclusive content

scoops pic-comp.jpg

Managing IP was the first to report major stories that matter, from the race for EUIPO executive director to a UPC case backed by a litigation funder

In-house want joint working groups to monitor EPO quality

February kicked off with a follow-up to one of January’s most popular articles. Reporter Rory O’Neill revealed on February 9 that a group of in-house counsel had offered to form working groups with the EPO to monitor patent quality and improve examiner training.

The offer was among a number of proposals made in a letter, seen by Managing IP, sent to the EPO by members of the Industry Patent Quality Charter (IPQC). Managing IP revealed in January that the IPQC had secured a meeting with the EPO to discuss patent quality.

Click here to read the full article.

EUIPO race for the top job

In fact, it was a busy month for Rory O’Neill, who also secured two scoops on the race for the executive director job at the EUIPO.

First, on February 15, he revealed that João Negrão, president of the EUIPO Boards of Appeal, was officially in the running. Just a week later, on February 21, he reported that the French government had backed INTA CEO Etienne Sanz de Acedo for the role.

The EUIPO’s management board, made up of representatives from member states, the European Parliament and the European Commission, will nominate Archambeau's successor in June.

The nominee will take the post in October, subject to the approval of the European Council.

Click here to read more about Negrão and here about Sanz de Acedo.

Litigation funder poised to launch UPC test case

February also saw the news that the Unified Patent Court will finally come into being after Germany deposited its instrument of ratification on February 17.

Some parties, it seems, are wasting no time.

Just days after Germany’s ratification was confirmed, news editor Max Walters reported that a litigation funder had backed a case that it expected to launch once the UPC becomes operational on June 1.

The source said the funded party had decided to opt for the UPC rather than file in a national court now because of the new system’s Europe-wide reach and the potential for a strong outcome.

Click here to read the full article.

LOT Network aims to snag group of semiconductor firms

Over in the US, the CEO of the LOT Network said it planned to add more semiconductor companies to its membership by getting multiple businesses to join at the same time.

Speaking exclusively to Managing IP’s US reporter Rani Mehta on February 22, Ken Seddon said he was talking to several semiconductor companies, some of which have said that they would join provided others join at the same time.

“I feel like I’m playing matchmaking,” said Seddon, whose organisation stipulates that members automatically get licences to other members’ patents if those patents are sold to non-practising entities.

Click here to read the full article.

Appeal launched over ‘Russian warship’ trademark rejection

February 24 marked exactly one year since Russia invaded Ukraine.

That week also saw the applicant for an EU trademark for 'Russian warship, go fuck yourself' lodge an appeal against the EUIPO’s decision to reject the application.

Legal representatives for the Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine filed an appeal on February 21. The EUIPO had rejected the application in December.

The administration’s representative, Brussels-based law firm Bukovnik & Kulbaba IP Guardians, exclusively told Managing IP that the decision was groundless and that it planned to take the appeal as far as necessary.

Click here to read the full article.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A decision by the Paris Central Division will lead to more IP work for outside counsel, say sources
Courts are encouraged to deliver judgments within three months of a trial, but that deadline has been missed in several recent cases
Lawyers at Maiwald and Sterne Kessler analyse how patents with claims directed to medical treatments are handled in the US and in Europe
Michael DeVincenzo explains how he and his team convinced the Federal Circuit to find in favour of his client in a patent case against Salesforce
Funders and a litigator explain how litigation funding disclosure requirements could affect their business
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Discussions about whether to seek director reviews can come up frequently with clients, even though actual grant rates are rare
In the latest episode, we discuss why IP firms might be attractive to PE investors and bring you the latest news on submissions for next year’s IP STARS rankings
Back-to-back PE deals for IP firms in recent years show that IP firms are sitting on goldmines, so traditional partnerships should be open to change
Joseph Maraia, whose team left Burns & Levinson shortly before it closed, says ArentFox Schiff is looking at the right opportunities
Gift this article