InterDigital scores third SEP win in Lenovo fight

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

InterDigital scores third SEP win in Lenovo fight

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

Court of Appeal judges overturned the High Court’s Mr Justice James Mellor, who was 'beguiled by a sleight of hand'

The England and Wales Court of Appeal reinstated an InterDigital-owned patent on appeal in a blow to Lenovo, today, February 9.

The judgment overturned an earlier ruling by the High Court’s Mr Justice James Mellor, who found the InterDigital 3G patent invalid as obvious in January 2022.

According to Lord Justice Richard Arnold’s lead opinion, Mellor was “beguiled by a sleight of hand” in one of Lenovo’s arguments and accepted an incorrect claim interpretation.

The appeal concerned a document cited by Lenovo during its cross-examination of InterDigital’s expert witness.

An answer from the witness to a particular question from Lenovo led Mellor to find that InterDigital’s claims lacked novelty.

But Lenovo’s question evaded the key issue that Mellor should have focused on instead, InterDigital successfully argued on appeal.

It was a minor issue that received little attention during the High Court trial, Arnold said.

Mellor’s mistake was understandable given the number of issues he had to deal with, Arnold added.

Today’s judgment is the latest in a series of wins for InterDigital in the dispute, and the second at the Court of Appeal in the last month.

“This latest UK court victory, our third in a matter of weeks, serves as further confirmation of the quality of our patented innovations,” said Josh Schmidt, chief legal officer at InterDigital.

Mellor’s judgment in the FRAND trial, which concluded last February, is currently pending and is one of the year's most keenly anticipated UK patent judgments.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Gift this article