InterDigital scores third SEP win in Lenovo fight

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

InterDigital scores third SEP win in Lenovo fight

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

Court of Appeal judges overturned the High Court’s Mr Justice James Mellor, who was 'beguiled by a sleight of hand'

The England and Wales Court of Appeal reinstated an InterDigital-owned patent on appeal in a blow to Lenovo, today, February 9.

The judgment overturned an earlier ruling by the High Court’s Mr Justice James Mellor, who found the InterDigital 3G patent invalid as obvious in January 2022.

According to Lord Justice Richard Arnold’s lead opinion, Mellor was “beguiled by a sleight of hand” in one of Lenovo’s arguments and accepted an incorrect claim interpretation.

The appeal concerned a document cited by Lenovo during its cross-examination of InterDigital’s expert witness.

An answer from the witness to a particular question from Lenovo led Mellor to find that InterDigital’s claims lacked novelty.

But Lenovo’s question evaded the key issue that Mellor should have focused on instead, InterDigital successfully argued on appeal.

It was a minor issue that received little attention during the High Court trial, Arnold said.

Mellor’s mistake was understandable given the number of issues he had to deal with, Arnold added.

Today’s judgment is the latest in a series of wins for InterDigital in the dispute, and the second at the Court of Appeal in the last month.

“This latest UK court victory, our third in a matter of weeks, serves as further confirmation of the quality of our patented innovations,” said Josh Schmidt, chief legal officer at InterDigital.

Mellor’s judgment in the FRAND trial, which concluded last February, is currently pending and is one of the year's most keenly anticipated UK patent judgments.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article