Lenovo infringed InterDigital 4G patent, Court of Appeal rules

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Lenovo infringed InterDigital 4G patent, Court of Appeal rules

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

The Court of Appeal backed a High Court ruling which found that InterDigital’s 4G SEP was valid and infringed by Lenovo

Chinese device maker Lenovo infringed a valid InterDigital patent essential to the LTE standard, the England and Wales Court of Appeal ruled yesterday, January 19.

The ruling, which has yet to be published online, is part of a long-running dispute between the parties over access to InterDigital’s 4G SEP portfolio. It upholds an earlier finding made by the England and Wales High Court in July 2021.

“We welcome this decision from the Court of Appeal which comes as further evidence of the foundational nature of our innovation and the quality and strength of our patent portfolio,” said Josh Schmidt, chief legal officer at InterDigital.

A judgment in a separate High Court trial, which seeks to determine a fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) royalty for the patents, is pending.

At the FRAND trial, which took place in February 2022, Mr Justice James Mellor denied InterDigital’s request for an injunction that would have barred Lenovo from selling infringing devices in the UK until the case was finalised.

A determination on a FRAND rate is expected this year. The highly anticipated judgment will be seen as a test of the UK’s merits as a rate-setting jurisdiction.

The UK is considered to be a more favourable venue for patent owners than other jurisdictions, such as China.

In 2020, the UK Supreme Court issued the landmark Unwired Planet judgment, which said UK courts had the right to set global FRAND royalties.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article