Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IP specialist Kitchin to retire from UK Supreme Court


Kitchin is to hear the DABUS case before stepping down on September 29 this year

Lord Justice David Kitchin will retire from the UK Supreme Court in September this year, it was confirmed today, February 1.

Kitchin, who was appointed in October 2018, is the only intellectual property specialist serving at the UK’s top court.

“It has been an enormous privilege and pleasure to serve as a full-time justice of the court.

“This is the right time for me to step down and it will give me an opportunity to spend more time with my family and to pursue other interests,” Kitchin said.

It is expected that the lord chancellor will convene an independent selection commission to fill the vacancy.

A former barrister, Kitchin became a Queen’s counsel in 1994. His practice covered all aspects of IP including patents, trademarks, copyright, designs, and trade secrets.

Since the death of Queen Elizabeth II, the term Queen’s counsel has been replaced by King’s counsel to reflect the fact that King Charles III is the new British monarch.

But the judge is unlikely to slip quietly into the night.

Kitchin will hear at least one major IP case this year – Thaler v Comptroller-general of patents, designs and trademarks, better known as the DABUS case.

The DABUS dispute concerns whether an artificial intelligence tool of the same name can be named as an inventor on a patent application.

Speaking to Managing IP in 2019, Kitchin said all of the judges played an active role in shaping the court’s IP decisions.

“This can be extremely valuable because they can bring an insight to bear on that specialism that those working in it haven’t got,” he said in the interview.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library
Commissioner Hamano Koichi shares his vision for the JPO and explains that IP offices must promote innovation that drives social change
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
The Supreme Court, which is hearing two IP cases this week, should limit the power of US courts to rule on foreign sales
Safety standards wouldn’t lose copyright protection when named in law, so long as they were accessible for free online
In-house tech sources say Amgen v Sanofi has the potential to stifle their prosecution and litigation strategies if SCOTUS’s decision is too broad