Focus on quality over quantity, in-house urge EPO
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Focus on quality over quantity, in-house urge EPO

EPO

More than 70 people attended the Industry Patent Quality Charter roundtable today, December 8

The EPO must prioritise patent quality alongside speed of grant, in-house counsel argued at a public roundtable meeting today, December 8.

More than 70 people, including representatives from industry, law firms, and national patent offices, attended the Industry Patent Quality Charter meeting this morning.

Beat Weibel, chief intellectual property counsel at Siemens in Munich and the meeting organiser, said the EPO hadn’t listened to concerns on patent quality.

The EPO focused too much on internal efficiency and speed of grant at the expense of thorough search and examination, he said.

Richard Lloyd, director of patents at HP in France, said the EPO needed to give examiners enough time to be thorough in their work.

“Quality will come from the people the EPO has and the time they are given,” he said.

Joerg Thomaier, head of IP at Bayer in Germany, cited internal EPO correspondence that he said underlined the EPO’s focus on efficiency above quality.

An examiner who raised doubts over the patentability of an application was told to grant it anyway by the chair of his examination division, Thomaier claimed.

Sabine Kruspig, of counsel at Schwarz & Partner in Munich and an EPO examiner from 1992 to 2015, said the office viewed itself as a company with a production line.

Gabriele Mohsler, vice president of patent development at Ericsson in Cologne, was one of several in-house counsel to call for a more thorough examination of inventive step at the EPO.

“We need examiners to rigorously look into the prior art,” she said.

Time trial

Other counsel praised the EPO's work in speeding up grant times and clearing its backlog of patent applications.

Gautier Engisch, vice president and associate general counsel at Procter & Gamble in Brussels, said timeliness had once been a serious problem at the office.

“The EPO heard the complaint and fixed the problem,” he said.

Better searches and examination shouldn't come at the cost of timeliness, he added.

Lloyd of HP said the EPO search was seen as the industry gold standard. He also praised the office for its improvements on timeliness.

But he agreed that the focus should shift to quality, and that examiners should have enough time to do their jobs.

“The EPO is using new technology and trying to increase its coverage of databases, but it isn’t possible to eliminate the human element,” he said.

Cultural leadership was needed from the top to improve quality, Lloyd added.

Other suggestions included training opportunities for EPO examiners at corporate IP departments and an anonymous feedback loop for users.

Representatives from the national IP offices of San Marino, Switzerland, the UK, Hungary, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and Croatia attended the meeting.

The EPO did not send a representative.

A spokesperson for the EPO rejected the criticisms of its internal processes by members of the industry group when contacted by Managing IP last week.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tamara Moll discusses solving the mysteries of the universe over lunch, desk dancing, and why even old cookie recipes could benefit from IP love
Women leaders at four firms discuss how they handle clients' diversity requirements and build strong teams
The new head of Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick outlines his vision for the firm and explains why D&I measures need constant work
Based on surveys covering more than 25,000 in-house lawyers, the series provides insights into what law firms must score highly on when pitching to in-house counsel
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Tony Nguyen, who returned to Fish & Richardson this month after a year travelling overseas, tells Managing IP how and why he took the plunge
Tom Treutler, who previously managed the Vietnamese office of Tilleke & Gibbins, has joined East IP
Counsel discuss upcoming AI and data privacy legislation and what they’ve learned since Chile joined the Madrid Protocol
INTA has postponed its planned Annual Meeting in Dubai, but the organisation should think carefully about whether it wants to go there at all
The firm has named its new managing director after its former Asia head resigned earlier this year
Gift this article