InterDigital and Samsung in rare SEP arbitration pledge

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

InterDigital and Samsung in rare SEP arbitration pledge

Samsung sign on headquarters building in Milan, Italy. The Samsu

The Samsung deal is one of three new licence agreements announced by InterDigital today

InterDigital announced three new patent licences today, January 3, including a deal with Samsung that includes a binding arbitration process to set a royalty rate.

InterDigital and other standard essential patent (SEP) owners have publicly challenged implementers to enter into arbitration to resolve their SEP disputes. However, implementers have not always been keen.

Lord Justice Richard Arnold, a judge at the England and Wales Court of Appeal, has also promoted arbitration as a solution to what he recently called the dysfunctional state of SEP dispute resolution.

Samsung’s previous licence, which covered cellular wireless and video technology patents, expired on December 31.

“While we always prefer to conclude our licence agreements through amicable good faith negotiation, independent binding arbitration provides an effective mechanism for resolving licensing disputes,” said Liren Chen, CEO and president of InterDigital.

“I welcome Samsung’s willingness to enter into a new licence with us and their commitment to work through the remaining issues in arbitration,” Chen added.

Implementers have not always been ready to enter into arbitration, with parties frequently going to court or before other statutory bodies in disputes over rates, essentiality, and validity.

InterDigital today also announced new licensing deals with LG and Panasonic, covering products including TVs and computers. There is no indication those deals also involve arbitration.

Elsewhere, the US-based R&D firm is facing a lawsuit from Swiss semiconductor company U-Blox, which accused InterDigital of refusing to license 3G and 4G patents on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Public figures are turning to trademark protection to combat the threat of AI deepfakes and are monetising their brand through licensing deals, a trend that law firms are keen to capitalise on
News of Avanci Video signing its first video licence and a win for patent innovators in Australia were also among the top talking points
Gift this article