InterDigital and Samsung in rare SEP arbitration pledge

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

InterDigital and Samsung in rare SEP arbitration pledge

Samsung sign on headquarters building in Milan, Italy. The Samsu

The Samsung deal is one of three new licence agreements announced by InterDigital today

InterDigital announced three new patent licences today, January 3, including a deal with Samsung that includes a binding arbitration process to set a royalty rate.

InterDigital and other standard essential patent (SEP) owners have publicly challenged implementers to enter into arbitration to resolve their SEP disputes. However, implementers have not always been keen.

Lord Justice Richard Arnold, a judge at the England and Wales Court of Appeal, has also promoted arbitration as a solution to what he recently called the dysfunctional state of SEP dispute resolution.

Samsung’s previous licence, which covered cellular wireless and video technology patents, expired on December 31.

“While we always prefer to conclude our licence agreements through amicable good faith negotiation, independent binding arbitration provides an effective mechanism for resolving licensing disputes,” said Liren Chen, CEO and president of InterDigital.

“I welcome Samsung’s willingness to enter into a new licence with us and their commitment to work through the remaining issues in arbitration,” Chen added.

Implementers have not always been ready to enter into arbitration, with parties frequently going to court or before other statutory bodies in disputes over rates, essentiality, and validity.

InterDigital today also announced new licensing deals with LG and Panasonic, covering products including TVs and computers. There is no indication those deals also involve arbitration.

Elsewhere, the US-based R&D firm is facing a lawsuit from Swiss semiconductor company U-Blox, which accused InterDigital of refusing to license 3G and 4G patents on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Apple’s lawsuit against OpenAI, which features Tier 1-ranked disputes firms on both sides, reflects how trade secrets litigation is becoming a prominent competition feature
Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
Gift this article