Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

INTA opinion: Why we are not losing focus with patent remit


CEO Etienne Sanz de Acedo responds to a Managing IP opinion piece on the organisation’s increased focus on patents

In a recent opinion piece, senior reporter Max Walters wrote that INTA’s decision to target patent lawyers is intriguing but that the organisation should also decide what it wants to be.

My thanks to Managing IP for meeting with me recently to discuss the 2023 INTA Annual Meeting. We saw the recent opinion piece on some matters raised in the interview and we are, of course, more than happy to offer clarity.

The article focuses on one aspect of our conversation: why INTA is broadening its educational programme for the 2023 Annual Meeting to cover patents. This decision is in line with what our members are experiencing in their daily jobs. Increasingly so, they are working with not only trademarks but complementary rights. Their mandate is expanding, and they are expected to understand and participate in the business of the brand. No doubt, the role of trademark professionals has been evolving for some time and this is why we now refer to trademark practitioners as “brand professionals.”

Naturally, we want to provide our members with an educational programme that reflects this trend and helps them progress in their roles and advance in their careers. As your article notes, “we are constantly told that IP operates in a silo and that there is a disconnect between legal and business departments.” One of our goals is to break down these silos and raise the profile of IP among the c-suite, thereby also raising the profile of our members within their organisations. The Singapore Annual Meeting educational programme has two tracks: one on IP/legal – which covers the “traditional” IP topics that are still at the core of what we do – and one on the business of innovation, which takes a holistic view of brands and IP, including patents, which – of course – exist to protect innovation.

Finally, this should not be seen as INTA somehow losing its focus. As a mission-driven IP organisation, we are laser focused. Everything we do is undertaken in accordance with our carefully crafted strategic plan and corresponding implementation plan. And, as a member-driven association, our members are at the heart of everything we do. Our substantive (and geographic) expansion – and, indeed, our evolution – is helping us better serve the evolving needs of our members globally. INTA is an evolving organisation, but that does not mean we have lost our focus. In fact, the opposite is true.

We look forward to welcoming the global IP community, including patent professionals, to Singapore next May for the 2023 Annual Meeting and to engaging in productive and meaningful conversations around IP and brands and other areas of common interest.

 We hope this brings sufficient clarity on this matter.

 Etienne Sanz de Acedo is CEO of INTA, based in New York.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Online storytelling platform Humans of Bombay isn’t wrong for trying to protect its copyright, but it could have handled its dispute better
We have started accepting submissions from in-house counsel and teams for the 19th annual Managing IP Awards programme
Patient groups and generics makers may have to bear the brunt of India’s latest attempt at patent reform
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
Paolo Tavolato, who will share the role, said private equity support would help the IP consultancy achieve its ambitious M&A plans
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas has hired former Anand & Anand partner Swati Sharma and hopes to compete with specialist IP firms
Rapporteur-Judge András Kupecz ruled that education and training weren’t legitimate reasons for a member of the public to access documents
Searches for comparison prior art will be a little easier, but practitioners will have to put more thought into claim construction and design patent titles
The Helsinki local division rejected AIM Sport’s request for a preliminary injunction in a dispute with rival Supponor
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP