INTA opinion: Why we are not losing focus with patent remit

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

INTA opinion: Why we are not losing focus with patent remit

INTA_focus_article_2000.jpeg

CEO Etienne Sanz de Acedo responds to a Managing IP opinion piece on the organisation’s increased focus on patents

In a recent opinion piece, senior reporter Max Walters wrote that INTA’s decision to target patent lawyers is intriguing but that the organisation should also decide what it wants to be.

My thanks to Managing IP for meeting with me recently to discuss the 2023 INTA Annual Meeting. We saw the recent opinion piece on some matters raised in the interview and we are, of course, more than happy to offer clarity.

The article focuses on one aspect of our conversation: why INTA is broadening its educational programme for the 2023 Annual Meeting to cover patents. This decision is in line with what our members are experiencing in their daily jobs. Increasingly so, they are working with not only trademarks but complementary rights. Their mandate is expanding, and they are expected to understand and participate in the business of the brand. No doubt, the role of trademark professionals has been evolving for some time and this is why we now refer to trademark practitioners as “brand professionals.”

Naturally, we want to provide our members with an educational programme that reflects this trend and helps them progress in their roles and advance in their careers. As your article notes, “we are constantly told that IP operates in a silo and that there is a disconnect between legal and business departments.” One of our goals is to break down these silos and raise the profile of IP among the c-suite, thereby also raising the profile of our members within their organisations. The Singapore Annual Meeting educational programme has two tracks: one on IP/legal – which covers the “traditional” IP topics that are still at the core of what we do – and one on the business of innovation, which takes a holistic view of brands and IP, including patents, which – of course – exist to protect innovation.

Finally, this should not be seen as INTA somehow losing its focus. As a mission-driven IP organisation, we are laser focused. Everything we do is undertaken in accordance with our carefully crafted strategic plan and corresponding implementation plan. And, as a member-driven association, our members are at the heart of everything we do. Our substantive (and geographic) expansion – and, indeed, our evolution – is helping us better serve the evolving needs of our members globally. INTA is an evolving organisation, but that does not mean we have lost our focus. In fact, the opposite is true.

We look forward to welcoming the global IP community, including patent professionals, to Singapore next May for the 2023 Annual Meeting and to engaging in productive and meaningful conversations around IP and brands and other areas of common interest.

 We hope this brings sufficient clarity on this matter.

 Etienne Sanz de Acedo is CEO of INTA, based in New York.


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A Tokyo District Court ruling concerning movie spoilers, and a second chance for VLSI against Intel were also among the top talking points
Practitioners believe new AI tools at the USPTO will not replace lawyers or disrupt revenue, but instead expose where a trademark attorney’s value lies
Leighton Cassidy Legal hopes to leverage its founder's international experience and provide clients with a rare chance to receive litigation and prosecution under one umbrella
UKIPO rejects trademark application for 'Cristiano Ronaldo Origins' following opposition by Beck Greener client in a rare case that considered actual use
Partners at both firms have voted in favour of the tie-up, which marks ‘the largest law firm merger in history’
Head of IP, Andrew Brennan, and new partner, France Delord, explain how tech provides an edge in the battle for global brand owners’ business
Anton Hopen, shareholder at Trenam Law, shares how counsel should construct Section 101 claims as early 2026 PTAB data shows reversals rising in technical cases
Law firms should consider how they can help clients, as report calls on EU to use IP-backed financing to increase bloc’s competitiveness and attractiveness for businesses
In the final part of a series on challenging patent invalidation decisions in China, lawyers at Spruson & Ferguson and Marshall Gerstein share how courts adjudicate appeals
Stijn Debaene and Carina Gommers want Brussels-based Cast Law to be the place 'everybody wants to work'
Gift this article