Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Sponsored content

Protecting Japanese IP across Asia – MIP's Japanese Buyers' Guide 2022 launched

Editorial cover image.jpg

Managing IP has partnered with leading IP experts to share analysis of the IP landscape in the Asian markets that are significant for many Japanese companies

Click here to read Managing IP's Japanese Buyers' Guide 2022.

Managing IP’s Japanese Buyers’ Guide provides insights into the recent developments and legal framework shaping intellectual property (IP) in significant Asian markets that Japanese businesses interact with. Expert practitioners from India, China, South Korea, and the Philippines draw on their experience to enhance Japanese companies’ knowledge, complemented by firm profiles from across the continent and IP Stars patent rankings for several jurisdictions.

The protection and monetisation of IP is gaining prominence in India, and three of the articles focus on this increasingly important jurisdiction. The authors provide answers to the following questions:

  • Which institution could be a game-changer in Indian IP resolution?

  • What is the missing link in Indian patent procedure?

  • How can patent applications be amended in India?

Remfry & Sagar presents the High Court of Delhi as an example to follow across India because of its moves towards efficiency and streamlined IP jurisprudence. The firm notes that any delay in the protection of rights or the settlement of disputes can threaten the economic value of an intellectual asset.

Anand and Anand argues that the lack of a notice of allowance provision in the Indian patent system is leading to uncertainty for patent applicants, particularly regarding the timing of decisions. The article compares the Indian system with that used in the US, European Patent Office (EPO) jurisdictions, and Australia.

Keeping the focus on Indian patent procedure, Obhan & Associates details the limited conditions under which a patent application can be amended. The contributors explain what applicants should look out for when making changes.

Liu Shen & Associates reports on China’s initiatives to incentivise foreign companies’ research and development. Foreign companies with Chinese subsidiaries, or those establishing a base in the country, need a sound understanding of the employee invention system.

FirstLaw PC analyses the statistical trends since the introduction of the ex parte patent revocation procedure in South Korea in 2017. Japanese patentees comprised the majority of the foreign entities that instigated patent revocation cases, while the procedure has been most commonly used in the chemistry/metallurgy field. Electronics is the next most active sector, which indicates Japanese companies’ influence in this area.

Hechanova Group presents the main questions regarding the registration of trademarks in the Philippines and answers them in a systematic manner. The registration procedure is conducted either through a direct filing with the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines or via the Madrid System, and the article helps applicants to navigate either route.

The Japanese Buyers’ Guide answers many other IP-related questions and is a valuable resource for Japanese businesses with IP considerations involving other Asian jurisdictions.

Click here to read Managing IP's Japanese Buyers' Guide 2022.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The IPO must change its approach and communicate with IP owners about its attempts at clearing up the trademark register
Counsel are looking at enforceability, business needs and cost savings when filing for patents overseas
James Perkins, member at Cole Schotz in Texas, reveals how smaller tech companies can protect themselves when dealing with larger players
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The EUIPO management board must provide the Council of the EU with a performance assessment before it can remove the executive director
The European Commission confirmed that plans for a unitary SPC will be published in April alongside reforms to the SEP system
The court held that SEP implementers could be injuncted or directed to pay royalties before trial if they are deemed to be unwilling licensees
Patentees should feel cautious optimism over the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G2/21, say European patent attorneys
Significant changes to the standard of law are unlikely, say sources, who note that some justices seemed sceptical that the parties disagreed on the legal standard
Sources say the High Court of Australia’s ruling that reputation is immaterial in trademark infringement cases could stop famous brands from muscling out smaller players