EUIPO conference: Avoid TM cannabis slang ‘like the plague’

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EUIPO conference: Avoid TM cannabis slang ‘like the plague’

Gordon-Humphreys-RHS-EUIPO-IPCLC2022Alicante
The EUIPO's Gordon Humphreys (R) in discussion with fellow panellist Francesco Mattina (L)

The chair of the EUIPO’s First and Third Boards of Appeal gave an entertaining rundown of how examiners weed out cannabis trademarks

Cannabis trademark filers should choose their words carefully and “avoid like the plague” any slang words associated with the plant, said the chairperson of the EUIPO’s First and Third Boards of Appeal at a conference in Alicante today, July 7.

Gordon Humphreys, speaking on a panel moderated by Managing IP’s senior reporter Max Walters at the IP Case Law Conference, gave an overview of cannabis trademark filings and how the EUIPO boards approach them.

As he delved into the background, he mistakenly said the European Commission had been cultivating hemp – rather than discussing the issues around it – prompting plenty of laughter among the audience and a slightly sheepish self-correction from Humphreys himself.

He soon noted that EU cannabis filings have boomed in the past few years, though three quarters of them never make it onto the register.

That’s partly because there is no specific EU-wide legislation dealing with cannabis marks, he explained, but also because of the challenges such marks face when it comes to public policy, lack of distinctiveness, and descriptiveness.

Public policy is the biggest sticking point, particularly as EU member states’ norms vary greatly, Humphreys added.

The boards therefore often focus on the perception of consumers “with reasonable sensitivities and thresholds”, and those who encounter cannabis signs in their day-to-day lives.

“So it’s not acceptable to have a sign that trivialises the war on drugs,” he gave as one example.

However, cannabis filers often don’t help themselves in their choice of names, Humphreys added, noting that “imagination is often sorely lacking”.

Reflecting on two rejections, he said the boards vetoed a figurative application for simply ‘Cannabis’ (beers and alcoholic beverages), and another for ‘Cannubis’ (e-publication on medicinal cannabis), both for being descriptive.

Humphreys ended by saying cannabis applicants should avoid drug-related imagery or symbols, as well as colloquial terms like ‘pot’, and should minimise or omit references to ‘cannabis’ or ‘hemp’.

He reminded the audience that trademark registration doesn’t guarantee usability, owing to a separate regulatory system for cannabis products.

The two-day conference ends tomorrow, July 8. You can read more coverage here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article