Daimler and Nokia settle SEP ‘holy war’

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Daimler and Nokia settle SEP ‘holy war’

daimler.jpg

The settlement resolves all FRAND litigation between the two companies, including a referral to the Court of Justice of the EU

Nokia and Daimler have signed a patent licence agreement and settled all pending litigation, including a referral made to the Court of Justice of the EU, it was announced today.

Under the agreement, all the cases between the Finnish telecoms company and the German car maker filed in Mannheim, Munich and Düsseldorf will come to an end, and Daimler will withdraw its antitrust complaint at the European Commission.

This settlement brings a long-fought battle over standard essential patent (SEP) licensing in the automotive space – once described as a "holy war" – to an abrupt conclusion, dashing hopes of a legal answer to the end-point versus component-level licensing debate.

The deal sets out that Daimler will make payments to Nokia for licences to the latter’s mobile telecommunications technology, although the terms of agreement will be kept confidential, as agreed between the two parties.

Jenni Lukander, president at Nokia Technologies, said: “The agreement is a hugely significant milestone which validates, once again, the quality of our patent portfolio, the contribution of Nokia’s R&D to the connected vehicle industry, and the growth opportunities for our automotive licensing programme.”

Related stories

The news comes just over a month after Daimler and Conversant settled their connected cars dispute.

Over the past couple of months, the EPO and the Federal Patent Court in Germany have upheld the validity of Nokia’s patents, potentially spurring Daimler to settle its dispute with the Finnish telecoms firm.

In November 2020, the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf referred Nokia’s case against Daimler to the CJEU to get further clarity on the SEP dispute between the two companies.

In August, Germany’s Mannheim Regional Court ruled that Daimler had demonstrated unwillingness to take a fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory licence to Nokia’s LTE technology patents, and rejected a request from Germany’s Federal Cartel Office to refer legal questions to the CJEU.

After that first big loss for Daimler, Eeva Hakoranta, chief licensing officer at InterDigital in Finland and former head of IP at Nokia, said it was as if Daimler was marching its suppliers into a holy war by insisting on component-level licensing.

The announcement today did not clarify whether the settlement will help resolve a US antitrust case between Continental (one of Daimler’s suppliers) and the SEP licensing platform Avanci.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article