Brazil: Beyond traditional IP infringements in the online environment

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Beyond traditional IP infringements in the online environment

Sponsored by

daniel-400px.png
the-creative-exchange-svrei2myiv4-unsplash.jpg

André Oliveira of Daniel Law considers how IP infringement and brand protection has evolved in Brazil amid the pandemic

It has been widely reported that the COVID-19 pandemic has strongly fostered e-commerce. In Brazil alone, e-commerce sales have increased over 68% in 2020 when compared to 2019, according to the Brazilian E-commerce Association (ABComm). This trend has also led to an expansion on online IP infringements such as illegal streaming, set-top boxes providing unauthorised access to pay-per-view television channels and the sale of counterfeit products on social media and marketplaces.

Other than the online expansion of existing infringements, IP owners are facing an unprecedented escalation in the number of new online frauds. One example of an inherently online IP infringement is the unauthorised use of third parties’ marks and trade dress in application names for mobile phones.

The unauthorised use of trademarks in application names seems at first easy to tackle. A search on the app stores from the two major operating systems would be enough to unveil the infringement and enable take-down requests. However, infringers will often avoid the main operating systems and will use different platforms which have less stringent compliance rules.

Moreover, there have been infringements that go beyond trademark use in the application name and are serious enough to undermine brand reputation. For instance, the Daniel Law team came across financial scam apps which claimed to have a partnership with a giant tech company. The claims were evidently false but were amplified through influencer marketing and helped mislead consumers.

The same financial scam used an application name which was a registered trademark owned by an international company from a completely unrelated industry. As a result, the company started to receive messages from misled consumers asking if this unrelated company had a connection with the infringer.

Finally, the Daniel Law team have witnessed an expansion in the unauthorised use of trademarks in delivery services which have also become extremely popular in the time of the pandemic. As an example, a Brazilian delivery app had its trademark and trade dress reproduced or imitated by over 170 third parties in different local jurisdictions.

In this challenging scenario, IP owners should diversify enforcement efforts through real-time online investigation and monitoring combined with immediate take-down action and further traditional legal measures when necessary.

 

André OliveiraPartner, Daniel LawE: andre.oliveira@daniel-ip.com 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article