China future of IP: Cooperation is necessary for the IoT
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China future of IP: Cooperation is necessary for the IoT

Sponsored by

Internet of things

The global COVID-19 pandemic is affecting the world in various ways. One of the lessons we have learnt from this traumatic period is that while people always tried to find value in cooperation rather than in rivalry, cooperation could be more fragile than expected, especially in a multilateral scenario.

There is no doubt that the process of globalisation is unstoppable in the long run in spite of the current setbacks, but the trend of decoupling has certainly manifested itself. What concerns us is whether this trend is transitory and to what extent it will have impacts on trades closely connected with globalisation, in particular, the global intellectual property community.

Notwithstanding the pessimistic atmosphere, what we feel from a series of recent activities in the industry of the Internet of Things (IoT) in locked-down China provides hope for cooperation.

On March 2 2020, OPPO announced that it will license its cellular patents to the IoT industry through the Avanci licensing platform. According to OPPO, the patents made available to the IoT and automotive markets via the platform include its global standard essential patent (SEP) portfolio in 3G/4G telecommunication technologies.

Being one of the smartphone industry leaders, the Shenzhen-based company has been working on expanding its patent applications globally in various areas of technology for a decade and was recently in the top five in the 2019 rankings of company applicants presented by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) with 1,927 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) international applications.

In the announcement, OPPO unsurprisingly highlighted its willingness to make available to the industry the licences to its SEP portfolio based on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. There might be limitation on the scope of that availability, as OPPO's vague wording didn't made it clear as to whether all component suppliers in the upstream are covered.

Avanci's practice suggests incompatibility with universally accessible licences. All of the current 14 licensees are end-product manufacturers, including automobile industry giants like BMW, Volkswagen, Porsche, and Volvo. Last year, three of Avanci's licensors, Nokia, Sharp, and Conversant sued Daimler in Germany for the infringement of several patents. On the other side, Daimler and its suppliers have lodged antitrust complaints with the European Commission over Nokia's refusal to license component makers.

With its patent pool focused on wireless connection for the IoT, Avanci has recruited 38 SEP holders in the field as licensors, including not only wireless communication equipment/component makers like Ericsson, Nokia, Qualcomm, and ZTE but almost all of the active patent assertion entities (PAEs) involved in the recent worldwide SEP-licensing lawsuits, such as Conversant, InterDigital, Longhorn IP, PanOptis, Sisvel, and Unwired Planet.

Patent pools have proven to be an effective and efficient approach to balancing the interests of the licensors by providing a reasonable return on their R&D investments and those of the licensees in inexpensive royalty costs. The Fair Standards Alliance (FSA) has suggested in a set of recommendations on SEP pools that the success of the IoT hinges on licensing of connectivity and that patent pools can have notable advantages such as potentially reduced transaction costs and more clarity on cumulative licensing rates, provided that the terms are FRAND.

Another recent IoT event was an agreement signed by four Chinese smart home leaders, LEEDARSON, Nanjing Wulian, YunDing, and Lumi United, on January 9 2020 at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) 2020, solidifying their participation in the Connected Home over IP (CHIP) working group promoted by Amazon, Apple, Google and the Zigbee Alliance. Compared with Avanci, the CHIP working group is distinguished by its mandatory requirement of FRAND zero-royalty terms, which is consistent with the traditional preference for freedom to operate in the information technology sector. With the support and involvement of these members in China, global compatibility with IoT devices fuelled by Zigbee wireless connection technology could be secured.

The Zigbee quartet and OPPO have shown their faith in cooperation in this crisis of globalisation. Hopefully, their faith as well as the collective devotion of all IoT enterprises to interoperability will bring a brighter tomorrow to not only our homes but the whole world.

Guang Hou and Juan Wang

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Managing IP’s senior reporter Rani Mehta interviewed attendees at the INTA Annual Meeting in Atlanta about how they made the most out of their first day
A team of lawyers who joined Norton Rose Fulbright from Polsinelli say they were drawn to the firm's global platform
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers say a ruling concerning liability for trademark infringement could give company directors an easy way out and create litigation uncertainty
The LMG Life Sciences Awards announces the winners for the 5th annual awards
Some US lawyers have strengthened their connections with European firms as they help clients determine whether the UPC will become a 'centre of gravity'
In the latest episode, the team discusses the battle to take control of listed company and IP business Qantm IP, and looks at some recent hiring trends
To mark Mental Health Awareness Week, lawyers explain how they manage their mental health, and how they pluck up the courage to ask themselves difficult questions
IP lawyers unpick a case heard at the CJEU’s Grand Chamber this week that could potentially create a new world for litigation in Europe
A lawyer who replied to a cease-and-desist letter with just two words has shown others how to deal with vexatious infringement allegations
Gift this article