New Zealand: Is a registration regime for food-related geographical indications on its way?
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: Is a registration regime for food-related geographical indications on its way?

Sponsored by

kalamata olives and feta cheese with bread and herbs on a dark slate

A registration regime for foodstuff geographical indications (GIs) may soon be on the menu for New Zealand. If this happens, Prosciutto di Parma, Kalamata Olives and Feta will likely be struck off the menu, along with around 2,200 other product names.

Background to the proposed new regime

New Zealand (NZ) is currently negotiating a free trade agreement (FTA) with the European Union (EU). As part of the agreement, the EU has asked NZ to recognise a list of around 2,200 GIs and to adopt a new regulatory framework for the recognition of GIs in NZ.

Background to the FTA

In general, the EU-NZ FTA’s aim is to encourage bilateral trade in goods and services, remove tariff barriers and encourage foreign direct investment. As bilateral trade between NZ and the EU is worth nearly NZ$26 billion annually, there is strong motivation to achieve successful outcomes in the negotiations.

Of the $15.5 billion worth of goods exported from NZ to the EU in 2018, the majority of products were agricultural. Currently, the EU has high tariffs in place for these products and has adopted a protectionist policy in relation to its agricultural sector. NZ is a competitive producer of high-quality meat, fruit and wine, and would gain considerable economic benefit from the inclusion of these goods in an FTA.

Discussion paper and submissions

The NZ government has released a discussion paper setting out details of the EU’s proposed framework for NZ and has asked interested parties to file submissions regarding these standards. The deadline for submissions is April 24 2020.

NZ’s current regulatory framework for GIs

In NZ, GIs can be registered only for wines and spirits. The regime is governed by the Geographical Indications (Wine and Spirits) Registration Act 2006 (the act), which came into force in 2017.

The act prohibits the unauthorised use of GIs for wines and spirits, even where the true place of origin is indicated, where the GI is used in translation, or where the use of the GI is accompanied by words such as “kind”, “type”, “style” or “imitation”. A person who contravenes these provisions is regarded as having contravened Section 9 of the Fair Trading Act 1986, which prohibits misleading and deceptive conduct.

In NZ, GIs for foodstuffs are protected by the common law tort of passing off, the Fair Trading Act 1986 and the Trade Marks Act 2002.

The EU’s proposed regulatory framework for GIs in NZ

The EU is proposing that NZ adopt a registration regime for foodstuff GIs that is similar to NZ’s GI registration regime for wines and spirits. Under the new regime, foodstuff GIs would be protected against reputational exploitation, misuse, imitation and evocation. Furthermore, administrative enforcement action would be undertaken by public authorities, not producers themselves.

The EU is also proposing that NZ only refuse the registration of GIs that are similar to earlier protected trademarks if the trademark’s “reputation and renown and length of time it has been used” means the use of the GI is likely to mislead consumers.

Furthermore, the proposal provides that the 2,200 GIs protected under the FTA (including Prosciutto di Parma, Kalamata Olives and Feta) will be prevented from being removed or challenged unless requested by, or cancelled in, the EU.

What happens next?

If the NZ government agrees to these proposals, its current GI regulatory regime will be transformed. The legislative changes will likely have a significant effect on NZ’s agricultural sector and the way foodstuffs are marketed and sold in NZ.

And, who knows, in a few years, NZ consumers may have become quite used to buying “dry-cured ham” instead of Prosciutto di Parma, “purple olives” in place of Kalamata Olives and “white crumbly cheese” instead of Feta.  

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A senior USPTO attorney spoke at a Nokia-sponsored event on the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation today, November 29
IP counsel are ‘flooded’ with queries from clients worried about deepfakes, but the law has so far come up short
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Mathys & Squire has filed a test case that the firm hopes will make UPC pleadings available by default
Multiple representatives and their teams can now work on cases using the online CMS, but not everyone can submit documents
James Lawrence, partner at Addisons, explains how he convinced the full Federal Court of Australia to back his client in a patent dispute concerning mining safety equipment
The deal will allow the companies to use each other’s patents covering 4G and 5G technologies, and other cellular SEPs
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Three lead IP counsel in the US, the UK and China share how they walk the fine line between building in-house competence and splurging on external lawyers
Mike Renaud, head of the IP division at Mintz, explains his business strategy and how the firm justifies charging higher rates