Microsoft sues Samsung for breaking IP agreement
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Microsoft sues Samsung for breaking IP agreement

Microsoft has filed legal action against Samsung in the Southern District of New York for not complying with an IP cross-licensing agreement

“We don’t take lightly filing a legal action, especially against a company with which we’ve enjoyed a long and productive partnership,” explained David Howard, corporate vice-president and deputy general counsel at Microsoft, in a blog post. “Unfortunately, even partners sometimes disagree. After spending months trying to resolve our disagreement, Samsung has made clear in a series of letters and discussions that we have a fundamental disagreement as to the meaning of our contract.”

In 2011, Samsung entered into a legally binding contract with Microsoft to cross-license IP. Since then Samsung’s smartphone sales have quadrupled and it is now the leading worldwide player in the smartphone market. In 2011 it shipped 82 million Android smartphones, three years later it shipped 314 million Android smartphones.

“After becoming the leading player in the worldwide smartphone market, Samsung decided late last year to stop complying with its agreement with Microsoft,” said Howard. “In September 2013, after Microsoft announced it was acquiring the Nokia Devices and Services business, Samsung began using the acquisition as an excuse to breach its contract. Curiously, Samsung did not ask the court to decide whether the Nokia acquisition invalidated its contract with Microsoft, likely because it knew its position was meritless.”

Howard said Microsoft and Samsung have a long history of collaboration. “We are simply asking the Court to settle our disagreement and we are confident the contract will be enforced,” he said.


more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel say the USPTO's examples of AI patentability should make their lives easier and help point clients in the right direction
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Ehsun Forghany says he was impressed by the firm's focus on fashion and IP as well as the expertise of chairman Anthony Lupo
Counsel at medical device companies say the unitary patent, AI and terminal disclaimers are major areas of concern
The LMG Life Sciences Awards is thrilled to present the shortlist for the 2024 Ameicas Awards
Daniel Wise at Carpmaels & Ransford explains how he helped secure the first UPC revocation ruling on behalf of Sanofi and Regeneron against Amgen
Patent attorney Joanne van Harmelen reflects on how her move from full-service firm ENSafrica to IP outfit Adams & Adams has affected her practice
The EU should press ahead with plans to introduce a unitary SPC and the UPC and EUIPO should play leading roles, says Jörg Thomaier at Bayer
Lawyers reveal how they inform clients about the IP implications of fast-moving private equity deals
View the Social Impact EMEA Awards 2024 shortlist and join us on September 12 at The Waldorf Hotel in London
Gift this article