Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Is Alibaba China’s biggest brand?

Alibaba’s record-breaking IPO is a coming-of-age story for Chinese brands

alibaba20logo.jpg

The Chinese internet company’s much anticipated IPO last Friday has met the initial expectations of investors. Closing the day at nearly 40% above the opening price, the IPO will soon go down as the largest ever after it sold an additional 48 million shares this weekend.

While much of the frenzy has focused on the size of China’s growing middle class and its tremendous spending potential, the splashy IPO is also a stepping out of sorts for the Alibaba brand. The Alibaba name has been plastered all over the news in the months leading up to the IPO, and even if the average American or European did not know what Alibaba was (and it’s safe to say that Alibaba is already a household name in its home market), there’s a good chance many know it now. For many Americans and Europeans, Alibaba may be one of the few, if not the only, Chinese company that they can name. Even if most only think of it as “that Chinese company with the biggest IPO of all time”, that is still a big step forward, given the relative difficulty that Chinese companies have had in establishing strong brand identities outside of China (with a few limited exceptions such as Lenovo, Huawei and ZTE).

Even Alibaba’s detractors prove this point to a certain degree; the fact that there’s even an argument that the IPO is overhyped is an acknowledgement that there is cachet and value associated with the Alibaba name and its reputation as the eBay/Amazon/everything of China.

This is not a completely new development. Though Alibaba has had a relatively small presence in the US and Europe (though this may change soon), it has had success building its brand in other markets to the point where others are trying to use its goodwill. In fact Karen Law, senior counsel for Alibaba, told Managing IP that the company regularly deals with infringers in places such as India, Russia and the Middle East making Alibaba-branded goods or using the name for their own services.

Though Alibaba is on its way to being the first global Chinese brand, its Taobao market was listed as a USTR notorious market until December 2012. Since then, Alibaba has made an effort to shake off a reputation that it did not respect IP rights. In the past year, it has signed deals with luxury brands Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy and Keiring (owner of Gucci) to coordinate efforts to stop sales of counterfeits. And earlier this month, during UK IP Minister Baroness Lucy Neville-Rolfe’s visit to China, the company signed a memorandum of understanding with the China-Britain Business Council, agreeing to do more to crack down on infringers.

In a sense, Alibaba’s, and similarly China’s, development follows a tried-and-true pattern. Much like how the US had a reputation for having little respect for copyright until the development of its own publishing industry in the late 19th century, the expectation has been that China’s attitudes toward IP protection will change when it, to borrow Neville-Rolfe’s phrase, has “skin in the game”. And China indeed wants to play - its National IP Strategy has ambitious goals for all forms of IP, including the development of world-renowned brands. It has also taken notable steps in strengthening IP protection. The continual improvement of IP protection on Alibaba’s marketplaces and in China overall is a reflection that their interests are aligning with those of international rights owners.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Civil society and industry representatives met in Geneva on Thursday, September 28 to discuss a potential expansion of the TRIPS waiver
Sources say the beta version of the USPTO’s new trademark search tool is a big improvement over the current system but that it isn’t perfect
Canadian counsel weigh in on the IP office’s decision to raise trademark filing fees in 2024 and how they’re preparing clients
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Shira Perlmutter, US Register of Copyrights, discussed the Copyright Office's role in forming generative AI policy during a House of Representatives hearing
The award marks one of the highest-ever damages received by a foreign company in a trademark infringement suit in China
Two orders denying public access to documents have reignited a debate over a lack of transparency at the new court
Rouse’s new chief of operations and the firm’s CEO tell Managing IP why they think private equity backing will help it conquer Europe
Brian Landry, partner at Saul Ewing, reveals how applicants can prosecute patent applications in the wake of the Federal Circuit's In re Cellect ruling
Ronelle Geldenhuys of Australia’s Foundry IP considers the implications complex computer technologies such as AI have on decision-making