Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Law firms face more pressure over cost and quality

Law firms are under increasing pressure to offer clients fixed-fee billing arrangements, according to a survey by CPA Global


The IP management business received responses from more than 670 law firms and 930 corporates in its latest annual survey into the state of the market.

Fixed-fee billing was cited as one of the challenges facing IP practices by more than half of the law firm respondents, along with the pressure to attract new clients (cited by three-quarters of respondents), and growing profitability (cited by two-thirds).

Although the trend towards fixed-fee billing for IP filing and renewal work has been around for some years, it is often associated with clients representing some of Asia-Pacific’s emerging powerhouse IP filers. These companies have been able to leverage their high volumes of out-bound filing work to negotiate lower fixed-fee arrangements.


CPA’s survey, however, reveals that demand for fixed-fee bills is growing from both domestic and in-bound clients, and across patent filing and prosecution, patent renewals and trade mark renewals.

“Although law firms may say that demands for fixed fees might affect patent quality, corporates are also increasingly demanding an increase in quality. Clients are asking more of their law firms and they are feeling pressures on all sides as a result,” said Haydn Evans, vice president of IP Solutions at CPA Global.


The survey also asked respondents to comment on levels of infringement of their IP rights. Corporate representatives said infringement of their trade marks and patents had grown by around one-quarter, while infringement of their domain names was up by almost one-fifth.

When the same question was also put to law firms, more of them said they did not know whether levels of infringement of their clients’ IP had fallen, risen or stayed the same.

“Their answer suggests that law firms need to get closer to their clients’ businesses and find out how they are using their IP,” said Evans. “The results of the survey suggest that corporates are placing more importance on IP and want to align it more closely with the rest of their business. Corporate respondents also told us they are making more use of patent searching services to find out what their competitors are up to.”

“All of this means that people from in-house IP teams are spending more time with their colleagues in R&D and the commercial departments. The knock-on effect is that law firms are coming under greater pressure to help their clients be more strategic about how they use their IP.”

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel from BMW and Finnegan explain how they got an NPE to sign a covenant agreeing not to sue the automaker ever again
The blue checkmark could be a good tool, but it’s unclear how widespread its adoption will be, say in-house sources
Sarah Harris, partner at Williams & Connolly, reveals how her team secured a copyright victory at SCOTUS and reflects on why the case matters
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A Court of Appeal judge demanded respect for solicitor-judges after reprimanding a barrister for his 'unwise' words
Speeches at the UPC inauguration highlighted the gap between the unitary patent dream and the reality today
Sources with experience on both sides of the Atlantic believe hugely profitable US law firms may still take some convincing before agreeing to partner with a UK outfit
IP counsel urge the government to restrict safe harbour exceptions available to intermediaries and clear up doubts with the existing law
A New York lawyer could face sanctions after citing fake judgments generated by ChatGPT, but that doesn’t mean practitioners should shy away from AI
Klaus Grabinski told delegates at a UPC inauguration event that the proposed SEP regulation would limit access to justice