Law firms face more pressure over cost and quality

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Law firms face more pressure over cost and quality

Law firms are under increasing pressure to offer clients fixed-fee billing arrangements, according to a survey by CPA Global

cpa-challenge-300.jpg

The IP management business received responses from more than 670 law firms and 930 corporates in its latest annual survey into the state of the market.

Fixed-fee billing was cited as one of the challenges facing IP practices by more than half of the law firm respondents, along with the pressure to attract new clients (cited by three-quarters of respondents), and growing profitability (cited by two-thirds).

Although the trend towards fixed-fee billing for IP filing and renewal work has been around for some years, it is often associated with clients representing some of Asia-Pacific’s emerging powerhouse IP filers. These companies have been able to leverage their high volumes of out-bound filing work to negotiate lower fixed-fee arrangements.

cpa-fixedfees-400.jpg

CPA’s survey, however, reveals that demand for fixed-fee bills is growing from both domestic and in-bound clients, and across patent filing and prosecution, patent renewals and trade mark renewals.

“Although law firms may say that demands for fixed fees might affect patent quality, corporates are also increasingly demanding an increase in quality. Clients are asking more of their law firms and they are feeling pressures on all sides as a result,” said Haydn Evans, vice president of IP Solutions at CPA Global.

cpa-infringement-300.jpg

The survey also asked respondents to comment on levels of infringement of their IP rights. Corporate representatives said infringement of their trade marks and patents had grown by around one-quarter, while infringement of their domain names was up by almost one-fifth.

When the same question was also put to law firms, more of them said they did not know whether levels of infringement of their clients’ IP had fallen, risen or stayed the same.

“Their answer suggests that law firms need to get closer to their clients’ businesses and find out how they are using their IP,” said Evans. “The results of the survey suggest that corporates are placing more importance on IP and want to align it more closely with the rest of their business. Corporate respondents also told us they are making more use of patent searching services to find out what their competitors are up to.”

“All of this means that people from in-house IP teams are spending more time with their colleagues in R&D and the commercial departments. The knock-on effect is that law firms are coming under greater pressure to help their clients be more strategic about how they use their IP.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article