Apple, Nobel Prize, Kim Dotcom, Bose, Beats, Chobani, Rader bobbleheads – the week in IP
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Apple, Nobel Prize, Kim Dotcom, Bose, Beats, Chobani, Rader bobbleheads – the week in IP

Apple being the world’s most-valuable brand, Kim Dotcom’s downfall, the patent involved in the Nobel Physics Prize, a trade mark fight over the word “how”, Bose and Beats agreeing a settlement, and a Randall Rader bobblehead competition were among the intellectual property stories hitting the headlines this week

apple-logo-large200.jpg Apple: the most valuable brand

The brand and logo of Apple has been identified as the most valuable in the world, with a value of almost $119 billion, according to the Interbrand Best Global Brands annual report. This is more than the GDP of Morocco, Ecuador or Oman, reports The Guardian.

Google’s brand value was up 15% to $107 billion, putting it in second place ahead of Coca-Cola, which was up 3% to $81.5 billion, followed by IBM (with $72.2 billion) and Microsoft ($45.5 billion).

Facebook rose the most in this year’s rankings. Its brand value increased 86% to reach $14.3 billion. That placed it at 29th.

In contrast, Finnish mobile phone company Nokia fell 41 places to 9th, with a $41.1 billion value. Nintendo fell 33 places to 100th.

kimdotcom-100.jpg Kim Dotcom bubble bursts

Kim Dotcom has been very successful at being a thorn in the side of the music industry. But he has been less successful in his foray into New Zealand politics, as detailed in a story on The Diplomat this week called “The downfall of Kim Dotcom”.

The Internet Mana alliance – a coalition of Dotcom’s Internet Party and the leftist party Mana, which advocates for Maori interests – failed to win any of the 120 seats in New Zealand’s elections held on September 20.

Dotcom lives in New Zealand. The US has been eager for him to be extradited after a 2012 raid by New Zealand police with the help of FBI agents. The Internet Party ran against mass surveillance and argued for free tertiary education and marijuana law reform.

The Diplomat said the Internet Party gained initial interest. But antics such as a repeated expletive-filled chant against New Zealand Prime Minister John Key and a burning of an effigy of him turned voters off.

As The Diplomat relays: “New Zealand voters’ loathing of Kim Dotcom and his tainting of the country’s left played no small part in delivering Key’s center-right National Party a landslide victory. After the election, a jubilant Key had only one piece of advice for the defeated Dotcom. ‘Go away.’”

$180 for a prize-winning patent

One of this week’s winners of the Physics Nobel Prize years ago sold his patent for the discovery that won him the award for $180.

The winners of the prize were Isamu Akasaki of Meijo University, Hiroshi Amano of Nagoya University and Shuji Nakamura of University of California, Santa Barbara. The three had worked on producing blue LEDs in the early 1990s. Previously only red and green LEDs had been invented. The creation of blue LEDs allowed the development of colour LED screens and a way of making white light that is now used in LED bulbs.

At the time, Nakamura worked for Nichia Chemicals, while the other two worked at the University of Nagoya. Nichia paid Nakamura $180 for the patent in the early 1990s. He sued in 2001. In 2004 a Tokyo Court ruled that Nichia had earned more than $1.1 billion in profits from blue LEDs and added six zeros to the original payment – awarding Nichia $180 million in compensation. (Managing IP covered the famous blue LED case back in 2003).

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences this week commented when awarding the prize: “Their inventions were revolutionary. Incandescent light bulbs lit the 20th century; the 21st century will be lit by LED lamps. Their inventions were revolutionary. Incandescent light bulbs lit the 20th century; the 21st century will be lit by LED lamps.”

bose20headphones.jpg Lawsuit-cancelling headphones

Bose and Beats have settled a lawsuit related to noise-cancelling headphones.

Bose sued the Apple-owned Beats in July, accusing it of infringing five patents. It sought damages and an injunction to ban the sale of infringing Beats products. Apple announced it was buying Beats for $3 billion in May. The deal closed at the end of August.

A court filing this week in District of Delaware said the two parties have settled their respective claims and want to dismiss the case. No more details about the settlement were given other than to say both parties will be responsible for their own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.


How about that?

The New York Times this week – in a story with the confusing headline "If the Word ‘How’ Is Trademarked, Does This Headline Need a ™?" – reported on a bitter-legal battle between a best-seling author and Greek yogurt maker Chobani.

Author Dov Seidman has distilled his business of helping companies create more ethical cultures down to one word: how.

Chobani, founded in 2005, has recently strated using the prhase “How matters”, a phrase previously used by Seidman in some of his materials. Seidman sued Chobani and its advertising agency to try to halt Chobani’s advertising campaign because it infringes his trade mark for the word how.


randall20rader20bobblehead150.jpg The great Randall Rader bobblehead giveaway

One of the more unexpected emails into Managing IP’s inbox this week came from Santa Clara Law, heralding the news that not only did such a thing as a Randall Rader bobblehead exist but also that they were giving two of them away.

A fair amount of thought has gone into the bobblehead. For instance, the former Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit holds a microphone in his right hand to symbolize “his status as a front man of DeNovo, and in many respects, of the patent bar itself”, it says here.

He holds a nail in his left hand to symbolise both the NAIL polypeptide that revived the “obvious to try” doctrine and the nail-shaped trocar that clarified the law of co-inventorship and co-ownership.

To submit an entry, click here. But hurry, entries will not be accepted after close of business Monday.

Also on the blog this week:

Time to rethink the limits to trade mark rights?

Is Alice deterring US patent case filings?

Are utility models a key part of India’s economic strategy?

Who will be the UPC winners and losers?

Are patent boxes more than an IP-shifting exercise?

The worldwide problem of commercialisation

And in our news and analysis:

They tried to make me go to PTAB…

Federal Circuit orders Eastern District of Texas to stay Rockstar case

Indonesia’s new copyright law puts landlords on alert

Social media revealed as the new counterfeiting frontline

Brown Rudnick hires two in New York from Winston & Strawn

Honigman hires partner in Michigan from Harness Dickey

Academics call for EU law to protect trade mark fair use

Interview: Unified Patents targets more zones to protect against NPEs

PTAB petition filing down in September, second PGR filed

Canada’s Trademarks Act and Bill C-8 legislation makes progress

Federal Circuit schedules first IPR appeal argument

Singapore designated PCT international search authority

WilmerHale adds IP partner in London

Former IP High Court Chief Judge joins Yuasa and Hara

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

James Lawrence, partner at Addisons, explains how he convinced the full Federal Court of Australia to back his client in a patent dispute concerning mining safety equipment
The deal will allow the companies to use each other’s patents covering 4G and 5G technologies, and other cellular SEPs
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Three lead IP counsel in the US, the UK and China share how they walk the fine line between building in-house competence and splurging on external lawyers
Mike Renaud, head of the IP division at Mintz, explains his business strategy and how the firm justifies charging higher rates
Sources say firms must build relationships with clients that transcend their connections to individual partners
INTA’s resolution on online marketplaces and appointment of Amazon’s general counsel follow calls for the association to take a direct position on internet fakes
Counsel report where they’re seeing more issues with inventorship arise and how they’re getting this work in the first place
To mark the firm’s one-year anniversary, partners at Groombridge Wu Baughman & Stone reveal the biggest challenges of getting a new firm off the ground
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career