Defining "the public" in copyright disputes

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Defining "the public" in copyright disputes

A panellist called for clarification about what defines “the public” in copyright disputes in Asia in yesterday’s “Copyright aspects of embedding, framing and hyperlinking” workshop at the AIPPI Congress

Tony Yeo, director at Drew & Napier, said Singapore has no definition of “the public” when the issue of making something “freely available to the public” is being discussed, adding that this contrasts with the position in Japan.

He pointed to the case in Singapore of RecordTV v MediaCorp TV, in which RecordTV used an internet-based digital video recorder to make MediaCorp programs available online. The court of appeals found that the registered users did not constitute “the public” because the communications were made “privately and individually”.

“This is an issue touched on by the Aereo case, and that went the other way,” said Yeo. Perhaps if Aereo had come out earlier, the Singapore decision might have gone the other way.”

Fellow panellist Dale Nelson of Warner Brothers noted the language of the Aereo decision talking about performance being activated at a “’turn of the knob’—a click on a website”. “The Aereo decision found direct liability for public performance so I think it provides an opportunity to rethink some of the decisions that have been made about direct infringement,” Nelson said.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article