Is the B word now less of a curse?
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Is the B word now less of a curse?

Last September one of the speakers at our first European Patent Reform Forum described the fear of bifurcation at the UPC the "British angst". One year on and it seems that there is rather less angst around

Part of the reason for that is that lawyers from outside Germany ­– which already operates a bifurcation system for patent litigation – are finding our how the rules are likely to operate in the new Unified Patent Court.

But it is also because judges themselves are beginning to clarify the kinds of patents and patent cases that are likely to be subject to bifurcation ­– and suggesting the volume may be lower than many IP lawyers feared.


At our Forum in Munich in September 2013, for example, German judge Tilmann Buttner of the Regional Court of Düsseldorf  (pictured) explained to the audience which cases he might bifurcate if he were a UPC judge.

A year later at our Forum in Paris, Buttner said that over the past 12 months he had revised his thinking and was now less inclined to bifurcate.

“Last year I talked about some cases being “bifurcation cases” and others not. I would rather not bifurcate. [UPC] courts are in a good position to render good and reasonable decisions on revocation as well as infringement because they will have a technical judge.”

“My message is that we may not bifurcate. But even if we do, it’s not all bad. The courts are likely to hand down a conditional decision that is subject to the revocation decision.”

But there is also a sense that lawyers are becoming more adept at developing new strategies to deal with new patent litigation rules.

Speaking about the two-year-old US Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Charles Larsen of Ropes & Gray told the audience: “We Americans used to fear bifurcation. Now we’re doing it”.

You can read more about the popularity of the PTAB’s procedures for parties seeking to invalidate a patent in the latest issue of Managing IP.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Industry Patent Quality Charter hosted a conference in which it discussed the importance of granting high-quality patents
Julia Holden explains why, if she weren’t in IP, she would be directing and producing live English-language theatre
The impact of the recently agreed treaty may be modest at first but is likely to become more significant over time
Meet the esteemed judges who are assessing the first-ever Social Impact Awards
Lawyers debate whether the Supreme Court’s ruling helps maintain confidence in the trademark system
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The group of lawyers, which includes seven IP partners, say they were impressed by ArentFox Schiff's wide-reaching experience
Andy Sherman, general counsel at Dolby Laboratories, says the company will continue to make GE Licensing’s patents available through existing pools
CMS, which represents Nestlé, had been told to respond to a cancellation action by February 12 but filed its response a day later
Keith Bergelt, CEO of the Open Invention Network, explains why AI technologies were not part of an update to its cross-licensing project
Gift this article