INTA Annual Meetings past, present and future
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

INTA Annual Meetings past, present and future

You don’t spend 15 years as Executive Director of INTA without being able to be diplomatic – and Alan Drewsen is suitably so when asked about his favorite Annual Meeting city

“I don’t want to slight anybody,” he says. But he adds that he likes San Diego as a city, and it is a popular destination – INTA has two more meetings planned there in the next 12 years. “I also very much liked the Berlin Annual Meeting – the Convention Center was far from the hotels but getting access on the underground worked very well. It’s a fascinating city. Chicago was great, and Seattle is one of the most popular ones because it’s a little more compact and easier to do business.”

Last year’s Annual Meeting in Washington DC set a new record, with some 9,600 attendees and Drewsen says this year’s has been running at the same level for pre-registrations. But he believes next year’s, in Hong Kong, could be even bigger: “I think the Hong Kong meeting will be the largest one, absolutely. There may be a different mix – more people from Asia, fewer from the United States – but everybody we talk to in Asia is very excited.” Looking ahead, he predicts that the Annual Meeting could certainly grow to be 12,000 to 13,000 people within the next few years.

With the Annual Meeting continuing to expand, isn’t there a risk that that’s all INTA becomes known for, and the rest of its work is overshadowed? Drewsen rejects this, saying the volunteer participation is “significant” with thousands of individuals putting their names forward for committee selection: “For some people the Annual Meeting is their only interaction with INTA and some of them don’t recognize the other benefits of the association. But maybe somebody in their firm does. I don’t consider that to be a drawback.”

He also denies that the presence of so-called “in-connection-with” people are a threat. These are those who don’t register for the Annual Meeting, but visit the host city to take advantage of meetings and networking opportunities. Drewsen says he would love it if they all registered, but that in some cases they are only visiting briefly, don’t need to collect CLE points and have colleagues who are registered. “The main point is I’d like to know how many it is because it would have an impact on our negotiations with future sites: the number of room nights and overall contribution to the economy of the home city.”

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers reveal how they inform clients about the IP implications of fast-moving private equity deals
View the Social Impact EMEA Awards 2024 shortlist and join us on September 12 at The Waldorf Hotel in London
James Tumbridge talks about advising the government on AI and why his day could start with the police and end with legal networking
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows that the IP ambitions of Asian full-service firms and a life sciences focus in the US have prompted lateral moves
Michelle Lue-Reid has joined the IP business as its chief transformation officer and will look to implement major change initiatives across member firms
Chad Landmon, who joins in Washington DC, hopes to expand the firm’s Hatch-Waxman practice
The FRAND rate is only 5 cents higher than the per-device rate determined at first instance in 2023
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Nearly four months after joining Crowell & Moring, Edward Taelman reflects on starting afresh, new clients, and firm culture
Firms discuss the ebb and flow of life sciences IP work and explain how they help professionals pivot between specialities
Gift this article