Domain disputes rise again as new gTLDs loom

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Domain disputes rise again as new gTLDs loom

cybersquattingmitdbscrop-45.jpg

The number of UDRP disputes at WIPO grew by 4.3% in 2012, and has now almost tripled over the past eight years. With the imminent arrival of new gTLDs, how much further can the number of cases grow?

WIPO is the biggest of the four UDRP providers of UDRP services. It dealt with 2,884 UDRP cases in 2012, covering 5,082 domains, according to Melbourne IT. The volume has grown every year since 2003, except for a brief blip in 2009.

The only positive sign for brand owners trying to plan for the launch of the new gTLDs this year is that only 16 cases were filed over the new .xxx domain, which had its first full year in 2012. Martin Burke of Melbourne IT pointed out that this may be due to the 80,000 trade marks that were protected in .xxx in advance.

The lesson for brand owners is therefore to take full advantage of the Trademark Clearinghouse for new gTLDs and record their trade marks there.

Among other trends, the 88% success rate of UDRP cases, up slightly on the 85% average over the years, shows that brand owners are getting better at bringing the right UDRP complaints.

And perhaps unsurprisingly, China was the biggest new source of cybersquatting, with a 47% increase in UDRP respondents. The United States remains the biggest source of cybersquatters, however.

The trends are summarised in this infographic from Melbourne IT:


cybersquatting-608.jpg
more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
Gift this article