Device marks to be protected in new gTLD Clearinghouse

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Device marks to be protected in new gTLD Clearinghouse

Device trade marks will be eligible for inclusion in the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH), which will help protect trade mark rights when the new gTLDs are rolled out later this year

The TMCH operator, Deloitte, is publishing the registration guidelines today. They will confirm that device marks as well as word marks and unregistered marks recognised by a court will be accepted.

However the device mark must include characters that are predominant, clearly separable or distinguishable from the device element and they must be in the same order in the mark and the TMCH application.

In the event of doubt, trade mark office records or Deloitte’s own analysis will be decisive.

The TMCH is a new instrument designed to provide some protection for trade marks and related rights when new gTLDs are launched. Icann announced this week that it will go live on March 26 this year.

Managing IP understands that any trade marks recorded from that date will be protected with effect from the date of the launch of the first new gTLD. That means there is no disadvantage in terms of term of protection or cost for filing early.

Recordal in the TMCH costs up to $150 per trade mark and means the mark benefits from two services, both of which are mandatory for new gTLD registries: Trademark Claims and Sunrise.

Under the Trademark Claims service, applicants for domain names in new gTLDs will receive a warning notice if they try to register a domain name that exactly matches a TMCH record. If they go ahead anyway, the trade mark owner will receive a notification.

The Sunrise service, which only applies to TMCH marks which have proof of use, enables trade mark owners to take advantage of sunrise periods offered by new gTLD registries to protect their marks. But it is up to registries to set the price of sunrise registrations.

Registries can also offer additional IP protections, and some have indicated they will do so. For example, they could offer sunrise periods that are longer than the stipulated 30 days or they could extend protection to similar as well as exact matches.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The High Court’s decision in WaterRower v Liking could have signalled the start of a new approach to determining whether designs can benefit from copyright protection
Maohua Wang, head of the IP group at King & Wood Mallesons in China, explains how the firm’s Eversheds deal affected the IP team and how his team meets clients’ litigation needs
Firms that advise generics businesses reflect on whether they’re seeing more aggressive tactics from innovators and how they’re managing their practices
Suspicions concerning AI in the legal space, and another copyright win for Ed Sheeran were among the biggest IP developments this week
Michael Sitzman, a life sciences litigator, explains how McDermott’s busy schedule at the UPC convinced him to join
The UK’s top court will hand down the decision next week, 17 months after hearing arguments in the crucial trademark dispute
Ceyda Maisami explains why HP is becoming more vocal in its SEP arguments and reveals why the company has transformed the way it engages with outside counsel
In the latest UPC update, we examine a ruling on director liability, another on the Gillette defence, and look ahead to cases concerning medical devices
Burak Yüceel outlines six characteristics that make a successful IP practitioner and explains why Alan Turing is an inspiration
Lawyers at Dentons unpick the findings of a survey that revealed that businesses tend to focus on reactive rather than proactive use of AI when performing IP evaluations
Gift this article