Device marks to be protected in new gTLD Clearinghouse
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Device marks to be protected in new gTLD Clearinghouse

Device trade marks will be eligible for inclusion in the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH), which will help protect trade mark rights when the new gTLDs are rolled out later this year

The TMCH operator, Deloitte, is publishing the registration guidelines today. They will confirm that device marks as well as word marks and unregistered marks recognised by a court will be accepted.

However the device mark must include characters that are predominant, clearly separable or distinguishable from the device element and they must be in the same order in the mark and the TMCH application.

In the event of doubt, trade mark office records or Deloitte’s own analysis will be decisive.

The TMCH is a new instrument designed to provide some protection for trade marks and related rights when new gTLDs are launched. Icann announced this week that it will go live on March 26 this year.

Managing IP understands that any trade marks recorded from that date will be protected with effect from the date of the launch of the first new gTLD. That means there is no disadvantage in terms of term of protection or cost for filing early.

Recordal in the TMCH costs up to $150 per trade mark and means the mark benefits from two services, both of which are mandatory for new gTLD registries: Trademark Claims and Sunrise.

Under the Trademark Claims service, applicants for domain names in new gTLDs will receive a warning notice if they try to register a domain name that exactly matches a TMCH record. If they go ahead anyway, the trade mark owner will receive a notification.

The Sunrise service, which only applies to TMCH marks which have proof of use, enables trade mark owners to take advantage of sunrise periods offered by new gTLD registries to protect their marks. But it is up to registries to set the price of sunrise registrations.

Registries can also offer additional IP protections, and some have indicated they will do so. For example, they could offer sunrise periods that are longer than the stipulated 30 days or they could extend protection to similar as well as exact matches.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers weigh in on the USPTO’s request for comment on the effects of AI on prior art analysis and obviousness determinations
A vast majority of corporates – especially smaller businesses – rely on a trusted referral when instructing external counsel, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Munich Regional Court ruled that Lenovo was an unwilling licensee and had engaged in ‘holdout’ tactics
Technological innovation should play a critical role in advancing sustainable practices, argues Justin Delfino, global head of IP and R&D at Evalueserve
Ewan Grist of Bird & Bird, who acted for Lidl in its trademark victory against Tesco, reveals some of the lessons brand owners can take from the judgment
Dolby’s lawsuit at the Delhi High Court follows a record win by Ericsson earlier this year against the same defendant
Tee Tan, chief information officer at the owner of several IP firms, says to avoid tech just for the sake of it and explains how his company builds in-house tools
Regardless of whether the FTC’s ban on non-competes goes into effect, businesses should stop relying on these agreements
Mary Till, a former legal advisor at the USPTO who has joined Finnegan this week, is looking forward to providing clients with a USPTO perspective
Gift this article