Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Goodlatte seeks to drop expansion of CBM review from anti-troll bill

House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte introduced an amendment to his patent reform bill yesterday that would drop his plan to expand covered business method (CBM) review to software patents

House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte introduced an amendment to his patent reform bill yesterday that would drop his plan to expand covered business method (CBM) review to software patents.

The bill, known as the Innovation Act, was introduced by Goodlatte in October in an effort to curb patent trolls. Amongst other things, it would require more transparency from NPEs about their subsidiaries, patents and business practices.

The provision Goodlatte now wants to remove would have allowed parties accused of patent infringement to challenge the validity of the patent in question through a streamlined USPTO post-grant procedure. The process would have provided a cheaper and faster alternative to litigation for accused infringers seeking to get a patent invalidated.

At present, this procedure is only available for certain business method patents “covered” under Section 18 of the AIA via CBM review. The cost of having a pursuing invalidation under CBM review tends to be in the $100,000 to $300,000 range including the cost of attorneys and filings fees, compared to upwards of $1 million to pursue invalidation through litigation.

In addition, CBM review allows patents to be challenged as being too abstract, too broad or too vague, grounds that are not available for other post-grant procedures at the USPTO.

Goodlatte’s about-face may be the result of the efforts by lobbyists representing large corporations with a business model that depends on patents. In September, over 100 companies wrote a letter to Goodlatte and other members of the Committee on the Judiciary protesting against plans to expand CBM review.

Expanding CBM review to other types of patents has received support from some trade associations and has been suggested in other legislation designed to combat trolls, such as the Stopping the Offensive Use of Patents (STOP) Act.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Civil society and industry representatives met in Geneva on Thursday, September 28 to discuss a potential expansion of the TRIPS waiver
Sources say the beta version of the USPTO’s new trademark search tool is a big improvement over the current system but that it isn’t perfect
Canadian counsel weigh in on the IP office’s decision to raise trademark filing fees in 2024 and how they’re preparing clients
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Shira Perlmutter, US Register of Copyrights, discussed the Copyright Office's role in forming generative AI policy during a House of Representatives hearing
The award marks one of the highest-ever damages received by a foreign company in a trademark infringement suit in China
Two orders denying public access to documents have reignited a debate over a lack of transparency at the new court
Rouse’s new chief of operations and the firm’s CEO tell Managing IP why they think private equity backing will help it conquer Europe
Brian Landry, partner at Saul Ewing, reveals how applicants can prosecute patent applications in the wake of the Federal Circuit's In re Cellect ruling
Ronelle Geldenhuys of Australia’s Foundry IP considers the implications complex computer technologies such as AI have on decision-making