Mexican Senator proposes limiting pharma patent terms

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexican Senator proposes limiting pharma patent terms

Senator Martha Palafox Gutierrez of Mexico has introduced a bill that would shorten the life of a pharmaceutical patent by about one year

The goal of the proposed legislation is to “combat social inequality” with respect to access to medicines, which “has polarized society between those who have everything and the majority who suffer segregation and injustice”, said the bill’s introduction. But Alejandro Luna of Olivares & Cia said that the bill is “clearly unconstitutional” and would violate several international treaties. He added that the chances of it passing through Congress are slim.

SEN. MARTHA PALAFOX GUTIÉRREZ

According to new regulations, all legislation proposed in Mexico must be studied and debated before being approved or rejected. Gutierrez’s bill is scheduled for discussion in about two weeks.

Luna said he is not sure that Gutierrez and her supporters are aware the bill would only shorten the life of drug patents by about one year.

Her proposal would make a pharmaceutical patent’s 20-year term start from the filing date of the first international application, rather than the date of filing in Mexico. Both the Paris Convention and Patent Cooperation Treaty allow applicants to claim priority to the earliest filing date of a patent, as long as they file in a member country within 12 months.

Gutierrez’s proposal would deny patent applicants who first file in Mexico and then file abroad the Mexican priority date.

A decision whether to approve or reject the bill should be made by the end of this Congressional session in July. While Luna said the bill is unlikely to go far, his firm and several IP associations plan to provide their input to Congress.

"The chances it will be passed are low, but we have to be careful as there is a new political party in power and we can't be sure," said Luna.

Alissa Rozen helped with translation for this story.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The new outfit, Ashurst Perkins Coie, will bring together around 3,000 lawyers across 23 countries
In the seventh episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Out, a network for LGBTQAI+ professionals and their allies
Sara Horton, co-chair of Willkie’s IP litigation group, reflects on launching the firm’s Chicago office during a global pandemic, and how she advises young, female attorneys
Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
Gift this article