US transport organisation files lawsuit against “frivolous” patent claims

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

US transport organisation files lawsuit against “frivolous” patent claims

The American Public Transport Agency has filed a lawsuit in an effort to halt “frivolous” patent infringement claims against its members by companies based in Luxembourg and the British Virgin Islands.

The complaint, filed last week, seeks to halt “frivolous” claims against public transportation agencies by ArrivalStar and Melvino Technologies for providing transit information to customers.

According to the complaint, every case that ArrivalStar has filed against public transport agencies has been settled within months of filing, “because ArrivalStar’s intent is merely to extract a harassment payment” from agencies that will be “disproportionately burdened” by litigation.

APTA is requesting a jury trial and is asking the court to invalidate the patents. The case is American Public Transport Agency v ArrivalStar and Melvino Technologies.

“Public transportation plays a critical function in American society,” said APTA in its complaint. “In the midst of a struggling economy for governments and citizens alike, where budgets are tight for everyone, the last thing public transportation agencies should be forced to do is pay unjustified license fees to patent holders making frivolous infringement claims.”

The suit follows several recent steps by the Obama administration and government agencies to curb the activities of patent trolls. Last month, the White House announced a series of legislative priorities and executive actions, the FTC said it would be investigating potentially anti-competitive practices of trolls and the ITC launched a pilot programme aimed at preventing trolls from gaining import bans based on frivolous claims.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Six hires across the IP spectrum reflect Orrick’s efforts to better serve tech clients across the IP lifecycle
David Stone, partner at White & Case, argues that the government’s planned reforms will modernise and futureproof UK design law, but leave two of the thorniest problems unresolved
Max Scott will join the firm’s IP transactions group in California, becoming the latest Weil IP partner to secure their future
Yonatan Drori, attorney at Drori-Stav IP in Israel, explains why foreign counsel must treat Israel’s patent disclosure requirements as an ongoing obligation, rather than a one-off formality
From Japan to Southeast Asia, domestic and regional firms picked up some of the biggest prizes, while key foreign players maintained momentum
Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Gift this article