US transport organisation files lawsuit against “frivolous” patent claims

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US transport organisation files lawsuit against “frivolous” patent claims

The American Public Transport Agency has filed a lawsuit in an effort to halt “frivolous” patent infringement claims against its members by companies based in Luxembourg and the British Virgin Islands.

The complaint, filed last week, seeks to halt “frivolous” claims against public transportation agencies by ArrivalStar and Melvino Technologies for providing transit information to customers.

According to the complaint, every case that ArrivalStar has filed against public transport agencies has been settled within months of filing, “because ArrivalStar’s intent is merely to extract a harassment payment” from agencies that will be “disproportionately burdened” by litigation.

APTA is requesting a jury trial and is asking the court to invalidate the patents. The case is American Public Transport Agency v ArrivalStar and Melvino Technologies.

“Public transportation plays a critical function in American society,” said APTA in its complaint. “In the midst of a struggling economy for governments and citizens alike, where budgets are tight for everyone, the last thing public transportation agencies should be forced to do is pay unjustified license fees to patent holders making frivolous infringement claims.”

The suit follows several recent steps by the Obama administration and government agencies to curb the activities of patent trolls. Last month, the White House announced a series of legislative priorities and executive actions, the FTC said it would be investigating potentially anti-competitive practices of trolls and the ITC launched a pilot programme aimed at preventing trolls from gaining import bans based on frivolous claims.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Apple’s lawsuit against OpenAI, which features Tier 1-ranked disputes firms on both sides, reflects how trade secrets litigation is becoming a prominent competition feature
Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
Gift this article