US transport organisation files lawsuit against “frivolous” patent claims

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

US transport organisation files lawsuit against “frivolous” patent claims

The American Public Transport Agency has filed a lawsuit in an effort to halt “frivolous” patent infringement claims against its members by companies based in Luxembourg and the British Virgin Islands.

The complaint, filed last week, seeks to halt “frivolous” claims against public transportation agencies by ArrivalStar and Melvino Technologies for providing transit information to customers.

According to the complaint, every case that ArrivalStar has filed against public transport agencies has been settled within months of filing, “because ArrivalStar’s intent is merely to extract a harassment payment” from agencies that will be “disproportionately burdened” by litigation.

APTA is requesting a jury trial and is asking the court to invalidate the patents. The case is American Public Transport Agency v ArrivalStar and Melvino Technologies.

“Public transportation plays a critical function in American society,” said APTA in its complaint. “In the midst of a struggling economy for governments and citizens alike, where budgets are tight for everyone, the last thing public transportation agencies should be forced to do is pay unjustified license fees to patent holders making frivolous infringement claims.”

The suit follows several recent steps by the Obama administration and government agencies to curb the activities of patent trolls. Last month, the White House announced a series of legislative priorities and executive actions, the FTC said it would be investigating potentially anti-competitive practices of trolls and the ITC launched a pilot programme aimed at preventing trolls from gaining import bans based on frivolous claims.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article