Weekly roundup: music-and-IP edition
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Weekly roundup: music-and-IP edition

This week’s roundup of stories from around the IP world features an inventor claiming to have patents covering podcasting and playlist navigation, and a study expressing doubts about the efficacy of graduated response programmes in preventing internet piracy

Playlist and podcast patent holder plays on

fuzeplusbluefront-screenart.jpg

The Sansa Fuze Plus

Personal Audio, the holding company known for asserting its so-called podcast patent (US Patent No 8,112,504) against major podcasters such as comedian Adam Carolla as well as networks NBC and CBS, is also seeing success in other parts of its portfolio. Ars Technica reports that SanDisk has agreed to license Personal Audio’s patent portfolio, including two (US Patents No 6,199,076 and 7,509,178) that cover audio playlist navigation and organisation. SanDisk is best known as a flash memory company and is a relatively small player in the audio player market, but Personal Audio has also struck agreements or prevailed in court against Apple, Motorola and Amazon.

Study: graduated response not effective

A study released this week by Monash University law lecturer Rebecca Giblin argues graduated response systems are ineffective in dealing with online copyright infringement. Looking at systems in France, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea, Giblin examined the extent to which the programmes reduce infringement, maximise authorised uses and “promote learning and culture by encouraging the creation and dissemination of a wide variety of creative materials”. By all three standards, the study argues that graduated responses are not effective.

Citing the report, the Green Party of New Zealand called for a review of the country’s three-strikes law. The program, which came into effect in September of 2011, handed down its first fine in January of this year.

Accusations fly in Bristol-Myers Squibb compulsory licence battle

The Times of India reports that Indian generic BDR Pharma has accused Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) of misleading the Delhi High Court. The two companies are locked in a multi-front battle over BMS’s leukaemia drug dasatinib. BMS has filed infringement proceedings against BDR, while BDR has applied for a compulsory licence for the drug under section 84 of the Patents Act. Counsel for BDR told the Times that BMS “misled” the court by stating that BDR’s compulsory licence application was rejected by the Patent Controller. Though the Patent Controller issued a preliminary notice stating that BDR did not establish a prima facie case for the licence, BDR argues that application is still pending with a final hearing scheduled for September 17.

In addition to the dasatinib compulsory licence application filed by BDR, the Indian government has also requested a compulsory licence for the drug under the “national emergency” provision (section 92) of the Patents Act. The request is still pending, though the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion has already rejected one section 92 request for another drug, Ro

tsr.jpg
che’s trastuzumab.

Teresa Stanek Rea to leave USPTO

Acting director Teresa Stanek Rea (right), who took the helm at the USPTO after David Kappos’s departure in February, has announced that she will be stepping down “in the near future”. In an email to her USPTO colleagues and later posted on the Patent Docs blog, Rea states that she expects her successor will be appointed soon, and praised the work done by the office especially during the sequester. She did not reveal what her future plans were.

Rea was the keynote speaker last week at Managing IP’s Global IP & Innovation Summit in Shanghai. Be sure to check Managing IP’s website for her interview with Emma Barraclough.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm was among multiple winners at a record-breaking 2024 ceremony held in London on April 11
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Americas research cycle has commenced. Do not miss this opportunity to nominate your work!
Increased and new patent fees could affect prosecution strategies for law firms and companies, according to sources
Five former Oblon lawyers felt that joining Merchant & Gould would help them offer the right prices to entice clients
The UK may not be a UPC member but its firms are still acting in proceedings, with Carpmaels among the most prominent
Naomi Pearce of Pearce IP shares how she is helping her firm become a life sciences leader and how generous policies have helped attract top talent
The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal filed by Ocado, in what was a key test for transparency at the new court
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer or professional about their life and career
INTA is calling out ‘immoral’ unregistered attendees at the association’s annual meeting, but the debate is more nuanced
Gift this article