First fine handed out under New Zealand’s three strikes law

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

First fine handed out under New Zealand’s three strikes law

The first fine has been issued under New Zealand’s three strikes anti-illegal downloading regime, according to a report in Stuff.co.nz

The unnamed user, who received a fine of NZ $616 ($500), had illegally downloaded Rihanna’s “Man Down” and Hot Chelle Rae’s “Tonight Tonight” for her third strike.

The system, part of the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Act, came into effect on September 1 2011. Detection notices are issued for the first and second instances to inform the user that he/she is downloading infringing material. If the user downloads infringing material a third time, an enforcement notice is issued.

Each instance of infringement must be more than 28 days apart. If the user downloads infringing material less than 28 days after a notice is issued, the subsequent action is recorded but there will be no additional notice.

After three notices, the copyright owner may file a complaint to the Copyright Tribunal. The rights owner may seek a fine of up to NZ$15,000 ($12,500). The Act also gives courts discretion to terminate the user’s internet account for up to six months.

Some rights holders have complained about the cost to issue a notice, set at NZ$25 ($20) plus taxes. A spokesperson for the Recording Industry Association of New Zealand (RIANZ) told Stuff.co.nz that it had issued about 6,000 notices since the law came into effect.

Some provisions have not yet come into effect. The three strikes system does not cover mobile internet usage at this time, though it is set to do so on October 1 2013.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

New filing data suggests Germany's grip on UPC litigation remains strong, while Bardehle Pagenberg, Arnold Ruess, Hogan Lovells and Carpmaels notch up notable cases
In 27 years, KASS has expanded to seven countries in southeast Asia and is now eyeing further growth opportunities. Its CEO shares her perspective
Mine Güner discusses bridging law and business, taking the initiative, and why Taylor Swift helped put copyright on the map
Cindy Goh discusses why she launched Cheang & Ariff's IP department, the improving litigation environment in Malaysia and what to consider when using AI
Increased focus on adding patent litigation depth to the firm’s Dallas office was behind the boutique’s most recent hires
IPH's Canadian acquisitions are paying off on paper, but a couple of strong years may not be enough to show that the group's strategy has truly won over the market
Examiner statistics could help patent prosecution practitioners tailor strategies, turning an area of high variability into a potential competitive advantage
The England and Wales High Court’s ruling in Accord v Novartis may not rewrite the law on plausibility, but it does signal a pragmatic approach that could provide greater certainty for life sciences innovators
Firms with established sports relationships and specialised expertise are well positioned to capture the market’s expanded pool of IP work
Gunjan Paharia discusses developing RIA, an AI platform built to draw on decades of institutional knowledge, support junior lawyers, and reshape how legal teams work
Gift this article