First fine handed out under New Zealand’s three strikes law

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

First fine handed out under New Zealand’s three strikes law

The first fine has been issued under New Zealand’s three strikes anti-illegal downloading regime, according to a report in Stuff.co.nz

The unnamed user, who received a fine of NZ $616 ($500), had illegally downloaded Rihanna’s “Man Down” and Hot Chelle Rae’s “Tonight Tonight” for her third strike.

The system, part of the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Act, came into effect on September 1 2011. Detection notices are issued for the first and second instances to inform the user that he/she is downloading infringing material. If the user downloads infringing material a third time, an enforcement notice is issued.

Each instance of infringement must be more than 28 days apart. If the user downloads infringing material less than 28 days after a notice is issued, the subsequent action is recorded but there will be no additional notice.

After three notices, the copyright owner may file a complaint to the Copyright Tribunal. The rights owner may seek a fine of up to NZ$15,000 ($12,500). The Act also gives courts discretion to terminate the user’s internet account for up to six months.

Some rights holders have complained about the cost to issue a notice, set at NZ$25 ($20) plus taxes. A spokesperson for the Recording Industry Association of New Zealand (RIANZ) told Stuff.co.nz that it had issued about 6,000 notices since the law came into effect.

Some provisions have not yet come into effect. The three strikes system does not cover mobile internet usage at this time, though it is set to do so on October 1 2013.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AI can exploit longstanding gaps in copyright protection at remarkable speed, but EU law still provides tools to fight back, says Simon Hembt at Bird & Bird
The firm has tapped a local patent trio to establish a foothold in the market and broaden its national presence
New Asia-Pacific IP head Jonathan Chu is eyeing opportunities arising from Chinese technology licensing, overseas enforcement and increasingly IP-heavy cross-border deals
Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Gift this article