Why everyone wants to talk about the America Invents Act

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Why everyone wants to talk about the America Invents Act

The AIA is the hottest topic at this year’s AIPLA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

While the America Invents Act (AIA) was the obvious focus for the 2012 Annual Meeting, this year’s planning committee, which began brainstorming sessions about a year in advance, was faced with the challenge of designing a conference around a topic in flux. With some changes like the first-to-file rules still not finalized, and others that became effective September 16 in very early stages, predicting a particular focus for each session was not easy.

But there was no uncertainty that members would want to talk about AIA implementation. “Given the timing, we decided fairly early on that we needed to have a heavy AIA focus,” said Sharon Israel of Mayer Brown, the officer in charge of the 2012 Planning Committee.

“Normally we would decide whether a subject deserves a morning or afternoon session,” said Manny Schecter, Vice-Chair of the Planning Committee and Associate General Counsel for Intellectual Property Law at IBM. But with the AIA as “the elephant in the room,” committee members decided to deviate from the typical AIPLA format. In the end, they settled on dedicating one track in each morning and afternoon session to the AIA. Schecter and Israel both identified Friday afternoon’s session, which examines the question of whether the new AIA system will work, as a must-see (Friday Track 1: AIA—Will the New System Work?, 2:00 p.m.—3:30 p.m.). The panel features a line-up of high-profile IP experts, including USPTO Director David Kappos.

But since the Association’s members include lawyers who practice overseas and across all areas of IP, how to cover patent reform while providing “something for everybody” presented an additional challenge.

Israel and Schecter said they tried to strike a balance between topics relating to U.S. and international IP issues. Thursday’s session will include an international track which covers the emerging markets of Israel, Brazil, South Africa and Russia. It will also include a discussion on advice for managing global IP portfolios.


Other important topics this year include the smart phone patent wars and the sometimes negative attention they have drawn to IP law (Friday Closing Plenary Session, Saturday 9:00 a.m.—12:00 p.m.), and cyber-security issues (Friday Track 3: Theft of IP through Cyber Attacks, 8:45 a.m.—11:45 a.m.).

This report was first published in the AIPLA Daily Report. Download the AIPLA Daily Report, published by Managing IP from Washington, DC from our conference newspapers page.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AI, cybersecurity and data practice group will provide clients with legal guidance around AI alongside a 'deep technical foundation’ in IP
Lawyers at Vondst and Biopatents say a ruling concerning the protected status of trade secrets could see the UPC flooded with requests to prevent access to confidential information
Sharad Vadehra of Kan & Krishme discusses why older IP firms still have an edge over up-and-coming boutiques and how the firm is using AI to provide quick and cost-effective service
Lawyers at Appleyard Lees share how they picked apart a plant breeder’s infringement claims concerning the ‘Tango’ mandarin
A further decision on long-arm status, and a new hire for Pentarc in Germany from Taylor Wessing were also among top developments
The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Gift this article