A new approach to TM infringement?
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

A new approach to TM infringement?

Is the infringement test under Article 5 of the EU Trade Mark Directive so complex that an alternative approach would be better?

That question, posed by Roland Mallinson of Taylor Wessing, sparked considerable debate at the 26th annual MARQUES conference, held in Athens last week.

Speaking in a panel on “Exceptional Signs”, Mallinson discussed referential use of trade marks, in particular where the same mark and same goods/services are concerned.

Citing cases such as Adam Opel, Interflora and Bellure, he suggested that the infringement test established by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has become too complex. A better approach might be to make the infringement test clearer and then clarify the defences available.

This would be in line with suggestions made in the Max Planck report, said Mallinson.

That report is now being considered by the European Commission as it prepares recommendations for changes to the Trade Mark Directive and Trade Mark Regulation. However, the proposals have been delayed and now may not be public until next year.

The MARQUES conference attracted over 600 attendees and the theme of the educational sessions was “Sign of the Times”.

Other panels addressed the challenges posed by technological developments such as augmented reality-based advertising and Google Goggles; non-traditional marks; enforcement, particularly online; domain name developments; and recent CJEU case law.

There were also presentations from WIPO and OHIM and workshops on topics including traditional knowledge and plain packaging, as well as excursions and receptions featuring Greek food and culture.

Detailed reports from the conference are available on the MARQUES Class 46 blog.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers reveal how they inform clients about the IP implications of fast-moving private equity deals
View the Social Impact EMEA Awards 2024 shortlist and join us on September 12 at The Waldorf Hotel in London
James Tumbridge talks about advising the government on AI and why his day could start with the police and end with legal networking
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows that the IP ambitions of Asian full-service firms and a life sciences focus in the US have prompted lateral moves
Michelle Lue-Reid has joined the IP business as its chief transformation officer and will look to implement major change initiatives across member firms
Chad Landmon, who joins in Washington DC, hopes to expand the firm’s Hatch-Waxman practice
The FRAND rate is only 5 cents higher than the per-device rate determined at first instance in 2023
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Nearly four months after joining Crowell & Moring, Edward Taelman reflects on starting afresh, new clients, and firm culture
Firms discuss the ebb and flow of life sciences IP work and explain how they help professionals pivot between specialities
Gift this article