Beware unregistered marks in the EU

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Beware unregistered marks in the EU

Companies outside Europe could be forgiven for thinking that trademark law around the EU is relatively harmonized, given the EU-level directives and Community trade mark system. Attendees at the Regional Update session on Europe yesterday were reminded, however, that that is not the case with unregistered marks.

The speakers took the audience on a tour of European countries and their sometimes confusing court decisions, beginning in the Baltics. In Latvia, the AKVAPARKS chain of water parks stopped another company using the AKVAPARKS name for selling a line of clothing, even though the former had no registered mark and the goods were not similar. Another case between Latvia and Estonia, however, saw a former agent of the EVERMEN clothing line retain his trademark registration because the court considered the agent had made sufficient investment in the brand locally—and the EVERMEN company did not have a local registration.

In France, there is very little protection for unregistered marks. The example given was Denver Electronics, a company with European-wide sales that was sued in France after a local company registered the DENVER trademark. Denver Electronics registered a Community trade mark at the time, but lost the case in France, leaving “the rather strange situation where it has a valid CTM but cannot sell its product in France,” said speaker Marten Bouma of Merkenbureau Bouma.

Although there is no protection for unregistered marks as such in the Benelux, its trademark act does allow companies to bring an action based on bad faith. That case was illustrated by Unilever’s attempt to protect a taco-shaped ice cream. In Turkey, too, bad faith is a powerful weapon and the ROCKSTAR line of games used it successfully to cancel a similar mark.

“There is certainly a desire for harmonization, and that was recommended in the recent Max Planck study on the European trademark system,” said Bouma. “But for now my advice would be to assume that Europe is a bundle of countries, not a union, on unregistered rights. Protection is the exception. So register what you can.”

Ceylin Beyli of CBL Law Office in Turkey spoke to a slightly different topic at the end of the session: how much a trademark can be used in a modified form, but still qualify for use in order to maintain its registration. Although EU law is harmonized, requiring the mark not to lose its “distinctive character” in its modified form, there have been different interpretations. In the UK, supermarket Asda succeeded in having several registered marks for the Penguin range of biscuits canceled, as a counterclaim in a passing-off case.

Other examples from the Czech Republic, Denmark and Switzerland showed that an instinctive reaction to the marks didn’t always tally with the ruling in the case, with Beyli ticking or crossing off each comparison in turn. “I was particularly surprised by the CRYSTALEX case in the Czech Republic,” she said. So be warned that even when the law is harmonized, Europe can raise a variety of problems.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article