When the content is the trademark

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

When the content is the trademark

In 2000, a bookstore owner in the UK found a poster in the shop with the words “Keep Calm and Carry On.” The owner hung it in the store and, when customers inquired about it, began selling copies. Since then, the phrase and the lone graphic—the crown of King George VI­­—have become iconic. Others have even registered the phrase as a trademark.

At Exploring the Outer Limits of Trademark Law, the panelists wondered about the outer limits and boundaries of trademark rights when it comes to nontraditional marks. Unlike traditional trademarks, so-called content marks like Keep Calm and Carry On say nothing about the source, origin or quality of their producers, said Christine Haight Farley, a law professor of American University Washington College of Law.

“Is trademark law a good fit in cases where the parties are trying to protect content?” she said. “The objective of trademark law is not to encourage innovation or creativity, but they’re extending to creative and innovative uses.”

Such questions often arise when phrases themselves function as the content of the merchandise. There are other examples: “Linsanity,” which found itself in the public lexicon after Jeremy Lin of the New York Knicks basketball team led the team to a winning streak in February, and “Winning,” which was popularized by the actor Charlie Sheen, who tweeted the word during his notorious breakdown.

With the poster’s roots in the Second World War, when the British government commissioned the propaganda poster in case of invasion, it’s not quite clear who has the exclusive right to exploit the content. Is it the bookstore owner? Is it the one who merchandized the mark and created demand?

As courts have yet to find a uniform answer to these questions, an attendee asked whether trademark owners should be concerned with the “lack of rigor” and the great amount of subjectivity judges are using. Haight noted stakeholders should be concerned. “I’ve heard the criticism leveled many times that copying an unprotected idea or design used to be called competition,” she said. “Now it’s called trademark infringement.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Magdalena Bonde discusses Abion’s AI experiments and reveals why an entrepreneurial mindset and a willingness to learn about a business are essential skills
Partner Ginevra Righini explains how she secured victory for the Comité Champagne in its fight against an EUTM application for ‘Nero Champagne’
Volkan Hamamcıoğlu joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss meditation, tackling deadlines, and taking inspiration from Hamlet
A $110 million US verdict against Apple and an appellate order staying a $39 million trademark infringement finding against Amazon were also among the top talking points
Attorneys are watching how AI affects trademark registrations and whether a SCOTUS ruling from last year will have broader free speech implications
Patent lawyers explain why they will be keeping an eye on the implications of a pharma case and on changes at the USPTO in the second half of 2025
The insensitive reaction to a UK politician crying on TV proves we have a long way to go before we can say we are tackling workplace wellbeing
Adrian Percer says he was impressed by the firm’s work on billion-dollar cases as well as its culture
In our latest interview with women IP leaders, Catherine Bonner at Murgitroyd discusses technology, training, and teaching
Gift this article