Why harmonisation has a future

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Why harmonisation has a future

Things are moving again at WIPO. That was the clear message from IP negotiators speaking at the Fordham IP conference in New York

Taking part in a panel on multilateral IP issues and policy, WIPO Deputy Director General Jim Pooley said there had been "inertia" in international negotiations since the TRIPs Agreement in 1995, with "almost religious" differences between some countries.

But, said Pooley, the tide is now turning. He noted that the US America Invents Act, passed in September, was a step towards harmonisation and added that WIPO's Standing Committee on the Law of Patents last year made progress by agreeing a substantive agenda.

Pooley also commended the work undertaken in the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, and in particular the negotiations on an Audiovisual Performers Treaty.

The AVP Treaty is set to be signed in Beijing in June, 12 years after a Diplomatic Conference on the same subject closed without agreement.

Justin Hughes of Cardozo Law School, who has negotiated the AVP Treaty on behalf of the US government over the past three years, agreed that there are signs of progress at WIPO.

He said this was partly down to "the natural tide of events": "Things had got so bad at WIPO that they had to get better."

He also said there is also now more pressure on WIPO due to bilateral and plurilateral negotiations elsewhere.

Allied to this trend, said Hughes, there is now greater honesty in negotiations: "People can say: these are my restraints, and the political pressures on me."

"There are precipices at WIPO we've been able to draw back from," added Hughes.

Asked by host Hugh Hansen whether they are optimistic that negotiations will improve in the next five years, the panellists were generally positive.

But they also warned that the world has become more complicated. Negotiations are "a much harder slog now," said Shira Perlmutter of the USPTO, thanks to public controversy over issues such as copyright and the internet, as well as changing dynamics between developed and so-called developing countries.

Perlmutter said states such as the BRIC countries are increasingly visible at WIPO and called this "a healthy development".

Read more about the negotiations leading to the AVP Treaty, and other discussions at WIPO, in an extended feature (including an exclusive interview with WIPO Director General Francis Gurry) in Managing IP's April issue, just published.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article