WIPO members fail to agree design law treaty timetable

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

WIPO members fail to agree design law treaty timetable

WIPO’s hopes of arranging a diplomatic conference next year for a new deal on rules for industrial designs have been dashed after member states agreed to review the progress of work at the 2013 General Assemblies

Earlier this year WIPO’s secretariat from the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications sought the views of owners and users of designs as part of a process it says will result in more streamlined, harmonised rules for filing applications for design rights around the world.

In May, Marcus Höpperger, director of the Trademark and Design Law Division at the IP organization, told Managing IP he hoped member states will conclude a design law treaty that does for designs what the Singapore Treaty did for trademarks and the Patent Law Treaty did for patents: simplify application procedures and harmonize registration formalities.

It proposes to standardise the rules national offices impose on the way that applicants must represent their design; filing date requirements; the length of the universal grace period that they offer; multiple design applications and the division of applications – among others.

But some member states want WIPO staff and the Organization’s chief economist to study how the draft articles and draft Rules on Industrial Design Law and Practice will affect developing countries.

The Committee agreed to ask the secretariat to carry out an analytical study.

WIPO says that at last week’s General Assembly in Geneva, member states emphasised the need to provide technical assistance to developing and least developed countries to implement any changes to design laws as a result of a treaty. Member states urged the Standing Committee on Trademarks to expedite its work.

The 2013 General Assembly will consider the progress made during the coming year and decide whether to convene a diplomatic conference to adopt a design law treaty.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article