WIPO members fail to agree design law treaty timetable

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

WIPO members fail to agree design law treaty timetable

WIPO’s hopes of arranging a diplomatic conference next year for a new deal on rules for industrial designs have been dashed after member states agreed to review the progress of work at the 2013 General Assemblies

Earlier this year WIPO’s secretariat from the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications sought the views of owners and users of designs as part of a process it says will result in more streamlined, harmonised rules for filing applications for design rights around the world.

In May, Marcus Höpperger, director of the Trademark and Design Law Division at the IP organization, told Managing IP he hoped member states will conclude a design law treaty that does for designs what the Singapore Treaty did for trademarks and the Patent Law Treaty did for patents: simplify application procedures and harmonize registration formalities.

It proposes to standardise the rules national offices impose on the way that applicants must represent their design; filing date requirements; the length of the universal grace period that they offer; multiple design applications and the division of applications – among others.

But some member states want WIPO staff and the Organization’s chief economist to study how the draft articles and draft Rules on Industrial Design Law and Practice will affect developing countries.

The Committee agreed to ask the secretariat to carry out an analytical study.

WIPO says that at last week’s General Assembly in Geneva, member states emphasised the need to provide technical assistance to developing and least developed countries to implement any changes to design laws as a result of a treaty. Member states urged the Standing Committee on Trademarks to expedite its work.

The 2013 General Assembly will consider the progress made during the coming year and decide whether to convene a diplomatic conference to adopt a design law treaty.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The five-partner team enhances Sheppard Mullin’s technology and life sciences capabilities, expanding its IP practice to more than 130 practitioners
In an exclusive interview, Rouse CEO Luke Minford, Arnold & Siedsma managing partner Steve Duxbury, and Wrays executive chairman Gary Cox discuss plans to build the world’s first ‘truly integrated’ global IP services business
Benjamin Grzimek, partner at Casalonga’s new Düsseldorf office, believes the firm is well-placed to challenge German UPC dominance
A lot of the reporting around the Anthropic settlement misses something critical: it isn’t that relevant to AI training, argues Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
Justin Hill and Marie Jansson Heeks, part of an 18-strong team to have joined Crowell & Moring, explain why IP client advice must go beyond only being called upon for patent disclosure
To mark the EUIPO having processed five million EUTM and REUD applications, Managing IP speaks to the most prolific representatives to uncover how they stay at the top of their game
The merger marks Rouse’s second M&A deal within a month, and will provide access to Arnold & Siedsma’s UPC offering
Simon Tønners explains why IP provides the chance to work with some of the most passionate, risk-taking, and emotionally invested clients
The co-leaders of the firm’s new SEP practice group say the team will combine litigation and prosecution expertise to guide clients through cross-border challenges
Boasting four former Spruson & Ferguson leaders and with offices in Hong Kong and Singapore, the IP firm aims to provide fast, practical advice to clients
Gift this article