Kappos pushes for grace period, Hague implementation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Kappos pushes for grace period, Hague implementation

At an AIA oversight hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday, USPTO director David Kappos focused on the path to international harmonisation

In particular, he emphasised the importance of other countries adopting a grace period and the US implementing several outstanding treaties.

Noting that he has met with several heads of patent offices around the world recently, Kappos said: “During these conversations, I stressed that a key requirement in realising international harmonisation is overseas adoption of a modern grace period,” Kappos told the committee. “Grace periods have been adopted in many patent systems throughout the world and are recognised as a global best practice.”

Under the AIA, innovators have a full year to apply for a patent after they have disclosed the invention without losing the ability to obtain the patent. This is to shield them from being gamed by a first-to-file system.

Kappos also discussed two treaties – the Patent Law Treaty (PLT) and the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs (Hague Agreement) – that were ratified by the US Senate in 2007 but have yet to be implemented by Congress.

The PLT merges national and international requirements in patent applications, reducing costs of obtaining patent rights around the world. The Hague Agreement streamlines design rights for member countries. It is administered by WIPO.

“Design rights, once considered an unsophisticated way to protect intellectual property, have become valuable tools for US companies,” Kappos said. “And – as the considerable attention to the innovations of Steve Jobs has shown us – the relationship between design and function has grown closer in recent years.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Peter Ling of Lenz & Staehelin in Zurich discusses trends in patent litigation, the regulation of AI and the benefits of teaching IP
Brandsmiths and Powell Gilbert will contest claims over several UK trademarks in a High Court case examining the ownership and revival of a heritage brand
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is taking a fresh strategic approach to pricing in its AI strategy. It could amplify calls for law firms to ditch the billable hour
Charles Harding plans to build a new team around life sciences oppositions and contentious work, drawing on his three decades developing a practice from scratch at D Young & Co
Gift this article