Global IP & Innovation Summit
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Global IP & Innovation Summit

Managing IP is hosting the Global IP & Innovation Summit in Shanghai in September this year

There will be lots to discuss at the upcoming Global IP & Innovation Summit to be held in Shanghai in September. As we have seen from the WIPO’s PCT statistics, published earlier this year, the number of filings from China grew by 33.4% in the last year, leaving it behind only the US, Japan and Germany for numbers of PCT filings in the past year.

The message seems clear: IP in China carries currency –increasingly so. Indeed The Economist recently noted:

Something strange is happening in China. For decades American politicians and businessmen have made it a ritual to bash China over theft of intellectual property (IP). But now Gary Locke, America’s ambassador to China has proclaimed that “…for every company calling for stronger IP protection, there are really more Chinese companies calling for the same…progress is occurring”

China is often considered to be becoming the world’s largest economy and this is driving a new level of respect for IP issues. Indeed, the establishment of an overseas IPR Help Centre for local enterprises was officially declared by China's Ministry of Commerce (Mofcom) on November 17 2011 during the session of the first national annual conference on business and law. As the Chinese government acknowledges:

As ‘knowledge economy’ and economic globalization advance further, intellectual property (as a mainstay in the construction of an innovative country) has become a key element in international competition.

However the government doesn’t shy away from acknowledging difficulties too:

In recent years, Chinese enterprises implementing the "going-out" strategy have encountered an increasing number of IP disputes, which not only discourage local companies from competing in international markets, but also bring negative effects to bilateral and multilateral trade relations.

But the complexities of bilateral and multilateral trade relations are manifold. The Economist also reports that from the perspective of foreign companies and innovators “the biggest threat (in China)…is opacity”. However, it is commonly suggested that foreign innovators are hampered not only by a lack of clarity but also by cultural, political and regional biases and barriers.

So, between international companies going in and local companies going out, at the global summit, there should be plenty for delegates to be getting their proverbial teeth into and much they can learn from one another.

Click here for more details about the Global IP & Innovation Summit

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Gift this article