Global IP & Innovation Summit
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Global IP & Innovation Summit

Managing IP is hosting the Global IP & Innovation Summit in Shanghai in September this year

There will be lots to discuss at the upcoming Global IP & Innovation Summit to be held in Shanghai in September. As we have seen from the WIPO’s PCT statistics, published earlier this year, the number of filings from China grew by 33.4% in the last year, leaving it behind only the US, Japan and Germany for numbers of PCT filings in the past year.

The message seems clear: IP in China carries currency –increasingly so. Indeed The Economist recently noted:

Something strange is happening in China. For decades American politicians and businessmen have made it a ritual to bash China over theft of intellectual property (IP). But now Gary Locke, America’s ambassador to China has proclaimed that “…for every company calling for stronger IP protection, there are really more Chinese companies calling for the same…progress is occurring”

China is often considered to be becoming the world’s largest economy and this is driving a new level of respect for IP issues. Indeed, the establishment of an overseas IPR Help Centre for local enterprises was officially declared by China's Ministry of Commerce (Mofcom) on November 17 2011 during the session of the first national annual conference on business and law. As the Chinese government acknowledges:

As ‘knowledge economy’ and economic globalization advance further, intellectual property (as a mainstay in the construction of an innovative country) has become a key element in international competition.

However the government doesn’t shy away from acknowledging difficulties too:

In recent years, Chinese enterprises implementing the "going-out" strategy have encountered an increasing number of IP disputes, which not only discourage local companies from competing in international markets, but also bring negative effects to bilateral and multilateral trade relations.

But the complexities of bilateral and multilateral trade relations are manifold. The Economist also reports that from the perspective of foreign companies and innovators “the biggest threat (in China)…is opacity”. However, it is commonly suggested that foreign innovators are hampered not only by a lack of clarity but also by cultural, political and regional biases and barriers.

So, between international companies going in and local companies going out, at the global summit, there should be plenty for delegates to be getting their proverbial teeth into and much they can learn from one another.

Click here for more details about the Global IP & Innovation Summit

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partners and other senior leaders must step up if they want diverse talent at their firms to thrive
European and US counsel reveal why they are (or aren't) concerned about patent quality and explain how external counsel can help
Firms such as Bird & Bird and Taylor Wessing have reported rising profits and highlighted the role of high-profile IP disputes and hires
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers in the corporate and IP practices discuss where the firm can steal a march on competitors, its growth plans in London, and why deal lawyers are ‘concertmasters’
Kathleen Gaynor, DEI specialist at Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick, says deliberate actions can help law firms reach diversity goals
Scott McKeown, who moved to Wolf Greenfield one year ago, says the change has helped him tap into life sciences work and advise more patent owners
The winners of our Asia-Pacific Awards 2024 will be revealed during a ceremony in Malaysia on September 26
Zach Piccolomini of Wolf Greenfield explains how to maximise your IP portfolio’s value while keeping an eye on competitors
Witnesses at a Congressional hearing debated whether reforming the ITC is necessary and considered what any changes should look like
Gift this article