Eggshells and private labels
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Eggshells and private labels

Brand owners and retailers have developed a unique rapport when it comes to private labels.

“It’s one of the most interesting relationships I’ve ever observed,” said Johnson & Johnson’s Jake D. Feldman, who moderated a panel on the topic yesterday. “Not only are they our customers, but they’re also our competitors.”

In what Feldman described as an “eggshell” relationship, the parties occasionally clash. Retailers must ensure their store brands don’t too closely resemble national brands. Often, they occupy the same shelves in stores. 

Andrew M. Solomon, associate general counsel of manufacturer Perrigo, said the company conducts extensive research to avoid disputes or, when responding to claims of infringement, defend its position. Perrigo develops, manufactures and distributes over-the-counter drugs and infant formula to stores like Target and Walmart. “We don’t want people buying Target store brands thinking they’re buying Johnson & Johnson products,” he told the crowd. 

“That’s interesting,” Feldman said, eliciting laughter from the audience. “I wonder if many brand owners think the same way.”

The panel also looked at McNeil Nutritionals v. Heartland Sweeteners, a recent case in which McNeil alleged Heartland’s private-label artificial sweetener’s packaging was too similar to Splenda’s. The Third Circuit ruled that while private label manufacturers could develop packaging somewhat similar to those of branded products, they could not produce trade dress that is essentially a duplicate but for a “tiny differentiating label.”

“This case affirms trade dress packaging as protectable,” said James D. Weinberger of Fross, Zelnick, Lehrman & Zissu. “It gives brand owners real direction about what kinds of things you can use on products and things you can’t.”

Still, Weinberger criticized the “broad general statements” the Third Circuit made regarding clarity on product source. “If I were a brand owner, I would not be deterred to pursue a case,” he said.

Feldman also cautioned private-label manufacturers and retailers from taking too much comfort in the decision. “I don’t think it’s completely clear,” he told attendees. “I don’t think this case is as helpful as a definitive case on private labels.”     

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Firms explain how monitoring, referrals and relationships with foreign firms helped them get more work at the TTAB
Luke Toft explains why he moved back to Fox Rothschild after working in-house at Sleep Number for five months
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
In a seminal ruling, the Beijing Internet Court said images generated by Stable Diffusion counted as original works
Boston-based John Lanza is hoping to work more with life sciences colleagues on the ‘exciting’ application of AI to drug discovery
The Delhi High Court has expressed its willingness to set global licensing terms in the Nokia-Oppo dispute, but it must deal with longstanding problems first
Some patent counsel are still encountering errors even though the USPTO has fully transitioned to the new system
A senior USPTO attorney spoke at a Nokia-sponsored event on the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation today, November 29
IP counsel are ‘flooded’ with queries from clients worried about deepfakes, but the law has so far come up short
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career