Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China trade mark: IP protection is enhanced for e-commerce in China

The e-commerce market in China is one of the fastest growing in the world. The boom in Chinese e-commerce has been dramatic and exponential. During the Chinese annual Singles Day shopping frenzy in 2018, the world's biggest 24-hour shopping event, Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba hit a record US$30.7 billion in orders.

To improve regulation over the flourishing market and maintain the market order, China promulgated the E-Commerce Law which will take effect on January 1 2019. The E-Commerce Law deals with a range of areas, such as intellectual property protection, personal data protection, advertising, competition and consumer rights. In this article, we highlight IP protection in the new E-commerce Law.

Under the E-commerce Law, "e-commerce" refers to activities such as selling goods or providing services through the internet or other information networks. It is also worth noting that the E-commerce Law will not apply to certain e-commerce activities including provision of financial products and services, news publications, audio and video programmes, general publications, and cultural products. The law specifically regulates three categories of e-commerce operators: i) platform operators (e.g. e-commerce platforms such as Taobao or; ii) operators on platform (e.g. online shops on those platforms), and iii) other operators (e.g. traders who use public accounts on apps).

In principle, the law requires all e-commerce operators to fulfil their obligations to protect intellectual property rights, consumers' rights and interests as well as personal information, cyberspace security and the environment. In accordance with Article 41, platform operators are required to establish rules to protect IP rights on their platforms, as well as to strengthen cooperation with IP rights owners.

Articles 42-45 of the E-commerce Law formulates detailed rules in connection with a notice-and-take-down procedure as follows:

i) If an IP right holder believes that an operator on a platform has infringed its IP rights, the IP right holder can inform the relevant platform operator of the infringement together with the prima facie evidence, and request that the platform operator take necessary steps including removing the postings or blocking links to allegedly infringing products.

ii) The platform operator shall forward the notice of the IP right holder to the operator on platform. Upon receiving the notice, the operator on platform may present a statement of non-infringement to the platform operator along with prima facie evidence.

iii) The platform operator shall pass the statement to the IP rights holder and request that the IP rights holder complain to the relevant competent authorities or bring its case to a court.

iv) If the platform operator does not receive a notice of a complaint or a lawsuit within 15 days, the platform operator should terminate the measures it has taken.

The E-commerce Law imposes liability for IP infringement on platform operators. If the platform operator does not take the necessary measures upon receiving the notice from the IP right holder, it will be jointly and severally liable for the additional damages caused by the IP infringement. If the platform operator knows or should have known about the infringement but fails to take the necessary measures, it will be jointly and severally liable for the entire damages. As the Law remains silent on what constitutes "should have known" about an infringement, this obligation can be broadly interpreted. On the other hand, to prevent the IP right holder from abusing its rights, the E-commerce Law stipulates that the IP right holder shall be held liable if it causes any damage to the operator on platform by its wrongful notice. If the IP right holder maliciously presents a notice, the liability will be doubled.

To further strengthen the liabilities of the platform operator, an administrative penalty is imposed against platform operators. In accordance with Article 84 of the E-commerce Law, if platform operators fail to take necessary measures against operators who have infringed IP rights, administrative authorities in charge have powers to issue a correction order. If a platform operator fails to make corrections in accordance with the order, it may be fined between RMB 50,000 (US$7,000) and RMB 500,000. In serious infringement cases, the fines can be more than RMB 500,000, up to a maximum of RMB 2 million.

Finally, it should be noted that the E-commerce Law typically requires web shops on e-commerce platforms to obtain a business licence, file tax returns and pay taxes. Although this provision triggers controversies by driving many smaller players out of business, the new obligation has a positive influence on e-commerce business in China. It was widely reported that counterfeiting by small players was particularly prevalent on platforms for a long time as it was extremely hard for an IP right holder or the administrative authority in charge to locate the real identification and address of an IP infringer. This new obligation leaves no room for small players who sell counterfeit products to dodge enforcement actions by simply closing their online virtual shop without paying any compensation and setting up a new e-shop later on. This provision will inevitably prevent a flood of counterfeiters and fraud in online marketplaces and create a healthy environment for e-commerce development in China.

Although it remains to be seen how the E-commerce Law will be enforced, it reflects China's pledge to protect IP rights in the e-commerce market. It is anticipated that platform operators will be revisiting their internal policies to step up their efforts to fight IP infringement on their platforms, which may ultimately eliminate counterfeit goods in online marketplaces.







GoldenGate LawyersSuite 2311-12, The Spaces International Center No.8 Dongdaqiao Road, Chaoyang District Beijing 100020, ChinaTel: +8610 5870

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel from BMW and Finnegan explain how they got an NPE to sign a covenant agreeing not to sue the automaker ever again
The blue checkmark could be a good tool, but it’s unclear how widespread its adoption will be, say in-house sources
Sarah Harris, partner at Williams & Connolly, reveals how her team secured a copyright victory at SCOTUS and reflects on why the case matters
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A Court of Appeal judge demanded respect for solicitor-judges after reprimanding a barrister for his 'unwise' words
Speeches at the UPC inauguration highlighted the gap between the unitary patent dream and the reality today
Sources with experience on both sides of the Atlantic believe hugely profitable US law firms may still take some convincing before agreeing to partner with a UK outfit
IP counsel urge the government to restrict safe harbour exceptions available to intermediaries and clear up doubts with the existing law
A New York lawyer could face sanctions after citing fake judgments generated by ChatGPT, but that doesn’t mean practitioners should shy away from AI
Klaus Grabinski told delegates at a UPC inauguration event that the proposed SEP regulation would limit access to justice