Malawi: Malawi accedes to Madrid Protocol and prepares to implement new legislation
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malawi: Malawi accedes to Madrid Protocol and prepares to implement new legislation

Malawi deposited its instrument of accession to the Madrid Protocol on September 25 2018, and the country will formally become a member of the international trade mark registration system on December 25 2018. Malawi has also posted the necessary declarations to make it clear that the refusal period will be 18 months, that mere intention to use is sufficient, and that the recording of licences in the international register has no effect in Malawi.

Malawi is a country that needs to specifically incorporate international treaties into national law before they become effective. There is no mention of the Madrid Protocol or International Registrations (IRs) in present trade mark legislation, the Trade Marks Act of 1958. There is, however, extensive reference to international trade mark issues – under the Madrid Protocol as well as the ARIPO trade mark system – in draft new trade mark legislation that was published a year ago. This draft legislation, the Trademarks Bill 2017, will replace the current legislation in its entirety.

We understand that the Trademarks Bill 2017 will come into force soon, but there is no definite date. Assuming that it becomes law on or before December 25 2018, all IRs designating Malawi should be valid and enforceable in Malawi. If there is a delay in the implementation of the new law, however, there might be a period during which it is risky to file IRs in Malawi. We will monitor the situation closely and report on developments.

In addition to making provision for IRs, the Trademarks Bill 2017 will modernise trade mark law in Malawi in a number of ways. For example, there will in future be a wider definition of the term trade mark, there will be scope for protecting service marks, there will be broader enforcement rights, there will be criminal offences for trade mark infringement, and there will be provision for actions based on unfair competition. We understand that initially the regulations that apply to the existing law will apply to the new law, but that, eventually, new regulations will be promulgated.

Wayne Meiring

Spoor & Fisher JerseyAfrica House, Castle StreetSt Helier, Jersey JE4 9TWChannel IslandsTel: +44 1534 838000

Fax: +44 1534

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A senior USPTO attorney spoke at a Nokia-sponsored event on the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation today, November 29
IP counsel are ‘flooded’ with queries from clients worried about deepfakes, but the law has so far come up short
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Mathys & Squire has filed a test case that the firm hopes will make UPC pleadings available by default
Multiple representatives and their teams can now work on cases using the online CMS, but not everyone can submit documents
James Lawrence, partner at Addisons, explains how he convinced the full Federal Court of Australia to back his client in a patent dispute concerning mining safety equipment
The deal will allow the companies to use each other’s patents covering 4G and 5G technologies, and other cellular SEPs
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Three lead IP counsel in the US, the UK and China share how they walk the fine line between building in-house competence and splurging on external lawyers
Mike Renaud, head of the IP division at Mintz, explains his business strategy and how the firm justifies charging higher rates