Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Singapore: Starbucks opposition to Mt Rainier mark fails

In a recent trade mark decision the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore, has rejected Starbucks' case against Japanese dairy producer Morinaga Milk and its Mt Rainier trade mark.

Starbucks Corporation ("the opponent") opposed Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha's ("the applicant") trade mark application for its Mt Rainier Mark for goods in classes 29 and 30 including, among others, milk beverages, coffee, and coffee beverages" ("Mt. Rainier Mark"). The opponent argued the Mt. Rainier Mark was similar to the opponent's well-known "Mermaid Mark". A judgment was made in favour of the applicant.

In Japan, the applicant is a well-known manufacturer of coffee and coffee-based beverage products and has been selling such beverages using the Mt. Rainier Mark for more than 20 years. The opponent is one of the largest sellers of coffee products in the world and its Mermaid Mark has been used extensively in Singapore and in numerous countries.

In the opposition, four arguments were made:

1) Similarity

The opponent argued the Mt. Rainier Mark was similar to the opponent's well-known green-and-white Mermaid Mark and thus under Sections 8(2) (b) and 8(4) (b) of the Singapore Trade Mark Act the Mt. Rainier Mark should not be registered.

In particular, the opponent made arguments that the green-black-white colour scheme and the layout of the respective trade marks within concentric circles resulted in an overall similarity between the marks.

While the IP Office of Singapore Adjudicator did acknowledge these similarities existed between the marks, it was found that the most prominent elements making up the respective marks were the words "Starbucks" and the "Mermaid Device" for the Mermaid Mark; and the words "Mt. Rainier"/"The Mountains Of Seattle" along with the picture of a "Mountain Range Device" for the Mt. Rainier Mark. It was found that these prominent textual and figurative elements were significantly different and as such the two respective marks as a whole were not similar.

2) Passing off

In addition, the opponent argued the grounds of passing off under Section 8(7) (a) of the Singapore Trade Mark Act.

The IP Adjudicator found the colour make-up of the opponent's concentric circle element lacked – by itself – source identifier qualities. Rather, it was again found the most prominent elements making up the respective marks were the word "Starbucks" and the "Mermaid Device" for the Mermaid Mark and the words "Mt. Rainier"/"The Mountains Of Seattle" along with the picture of a "Mountain Range Device" for the Mt. Rainier Mark. And, it was found that these prominent textual and figurative elements were significantly different and as such no misrepresentation in the nature of passing off would occur.

3) Misrepresentation as to geographical origin

Next, the opponent argued the applicant's mark was designed in such a manner that it would mislead consumers as to the geographical origin of the goods in violation of Section 7(4) (b) of the Singapore Trade Mark Act.

Here, the opponent argued the Mt. Rainier Mark would deceive consumers into believing the applicant's products were manufactured in Seattle when that was not the case.

For a finding of deception as to geographical origin, the IP Adjudicator found there needed to be clear evidence such deception would occur. The IP Adjudicator did not believe such clear evidence was present. Rather, the IP Adjudicator found the geographical reference was to "Mt. Rainier" and not to "Seattle." That is, the IP Adjudicator found the use of "Mt. Rainier", in combination with the phrase "The Mountain of Seattle," created geographical significance to Mt. Rainier as opposed to Seattle.

Further, since there was no evidence in the record to show Mt. Rainier has a reputation associated with coffee or coffee beverages of any kind, it was found that Singaporean consumers would see the reference to "Mt. Rainier" as a fanciful reference and not as an attempt to create a deceptive statement of origin.

4) Bad faith

Finally, the opponent argued the applicant's application was filed in bad faith under Section 7(6) of the Singapore Trade Mark Act and thus the Morinaga Mark should not be registered.

Here, the opponent argued that filing the mark with a reference to Mt. Rainier was a commercially unacceptable practice in that Mt. Rainier is a culturally important landmark. The IP Adjudicator didn't agree with this line of argument and thus the bad faith argument was rejected as well.

In summary, the opposition failed on all grounds and the applicant's mark will proceed to registration.

Daniel Greif

Prathashini Rague


Spruson & Ferguson (Asia) Pte Ltd152 Beach Road#37-05/06 Gateway EastSingapore 189721Tel: +65 6333 7200Fax: +65 6333 7222mail.asia@spruson.comwww.spruson.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Sukanya Sarkar shares her thoughts on this year’s annual meeting in Singapore, where debates ranged from AI opportunities to improving law firm culture
The court’s ruling is a good reminder that US parties aren’t guaranteed attorney fees just because they win, say sources
With business confidence in a shaky state, Rachel Tong and Lisa Yong of Rouse discuss how in-house IP teams can manage their trademark portfolios through uncertain times
The Court of Appeal had stern words for Med-El’s representatives after they highlighted a deputy judge’s background as a solicitor
Funders and NPEs say asserting patent portfolios can minimise risk at the USPTO’s PTAB, where procedure remains a controversial topic
The US Supreme Court’s ruling wasn’t a surprise and reflects a trend that had already been bubbling away for a while, say tech and pharma counsel
Previous attempts at major transatlantic tie-ups have failed, so lawyers will keep their eyes firmly on Allen & Overy’s grand plans
INTA CEO Etienne Sanz de Acedo shares his plans if he were to win the EUIPO leadership race and says his application does not affect his INTA role
The French finance minister told António Campinos the timing of an EPO event in Lisbon could be seen as interference in the EUIPO leadership race