Mexico: Litigating for reliable criteria
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Litigating for reliable criteria

When talking about reserva rights – a legal institution exclusive to the Mexican legal system, which protects a variety of assets, such as titles of publications or broadcasts, among others– there is a problem that stands out: an absence of certainty regarding the criteria used by the authority (the Mexican Copyright Office, or INDAUTOR) when examining applications.

Indeed, INDAUTOR's criteria tend to vary on a case-by-case basis, partially because reserva-related litigation is uncommon. This, in turn, leads to an absence of judicial precedents that could be used as guidelines by the authority.

For comparison, the authority responsible for trade mark rights (the Mexican Industrial Property Institute, or IMPI) usually applies well-established criteria, largely based on judicial precedents, as trade mark-related litigations are the bulk of IP contentious proceedings in Mexico.

As an example, recently a federal court overturned an INDAUTOR ruling which had denied protection for a magazine title. The proposed title comprised the name of a fictional character, but the protection was denied because it was considered that, potentially, the title could be also the "name of a person".

In this case, the court reasoned that while the law prohibits granting reservas for "names of persons used in isolation", such prohibition should be understood in connection with "existing individuals", and was not applicable for titles that could be the name of a person whose existence was not demonstrated.

This ruling hardly seems ground-breaking, since IMPI has applied the same criterion for years, in connection with a similar prohibition for trademark registrations. However, it was the first ruling of its kind regarding reservas.

Cases like this exemplify why reserva-related litigation should be encouraged, since the existence of judicial precedents would allow future titleholders to have certainty over the criteria that will be applied by the authority in each case.


Adrián Martínez

OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
The UPC judges are wrong – restricting access to court documents, and making parties appoint a lawyer only to have a chance of seeing them, is madness
The group, which includes the Volkswagen, Seat and Audi brands, is now licensed to use SEPs owned by more than 60 patent owners
Gift this article