Filing trends in Mexico
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Filing trends in Mexico

The following pages provide analysis of important intellectual property trends in Mexico, including a new law for industrial designs and geographical indications, the challenges of the new opposition system, and rulings interpreting patent claims. First, Michael Loney analyses recent filing trends

WIPO's World Intellectual Property Indicators 2017 report, released in December, features a wealth of data about worldwide filing trends. The report also includes a number of interesting details about filing trends in Mexico.

Patent trends

For the first time, more than 3 million patent applications were filed worldwide in a single year, up 8.3% from 2015

One interesting tidbit is that Mexico is one of the first offices out of the gate when it comes to the first office action on patent applications but it is one of the slowest for issuing a final decision. Average pendency time for first office action in Mexico is three months, which was behind only New Zealand's 1.3 months in the selected offices studied.

But Mexico was fifth-placed among countries studied for taking the longest to issue a final decision, behind Brazil, India, Czech Republic and Vietnam.

Patent grants by office and origin, and patents in force, 2016


Grants by office total

Grants by office resident

Grants by office non-resident

Equivalent grants by origin

In force by office

Mexico

8,652

423

8,229

950

109,238


Figure S5: Average pendency times for first office action and final decision at selected offices, 2016


Mexico IP filings (resident and abroad, including regional) and economy

Year

Patent

Trademark

Industrial design

GDP (constant 2011 US$)

2002

797

42,298

802

1520.09

2003

749

39,790

929

1541.72

2004

895

44,410

1,095

1607.94

2005

927

50,275

1,078

1656.71

2006

1,051

53,793

1,219

1738.62

2007

1,173

65,963

1,130

1794.33

2008

1,237

66,743

1,328

1819.46

2009

1,341

66,496

1,354

1733.94

2010

1,638

79,444

2,157

1822.54

2011

1,924

81,137

2,267

1896.26

2012

2,219

89,464

2,438

1972.45

2013

2,139

90,747

2,196

1999.28

2014

2,187

96,552

2,391

2044.57

2015

2,508

107,927

2,427

2098.33

2016

2,403

115,940

2,142

2146.65


Mexico had among the lowest share of processed applications that were rejected, along with Australia, Indonesia and Norway. "This can be explained in part by the high share of withdrawn/abandoned applications, where applicants decided to withdraw applications before they could be rejected," explained WIPO.

Among large middle-income origins, India (47.5%), Mexico (45.2%), Malaysia (42.5%), South Africa (28.9%) and Brazil (27.3%) have a high proportion of applications abroad as a share of total applications. The bulk of filings abroad from these origins were destined for the USPTO.

US applicants accounted for 51.3% of all non-resident applications filed in Mexico, a result of technological specialisation, proximity and market size influence cross-border applications. Only Norway (72.4%), Turkey (57.4%) and Canada (52.8%) had a larger percentage.

The WIPO report included data on the rate of women's participation in resident patent applications at national/regional offices, using a name-recognition technology developed by WIPO. Mexico had high rate of 36.4% of resident patent applications containing at least one woman, up from 22.7% in 2005.

Only the Russian Federation (38.7%) had a higher percentage. It was followed by the US (27.5%), Spain (24.6%) and Brazil (24.5%).

Commenting on the countries with the highest rate of women's participation on patent applciations, WIPO said: "These countries have a high share of total filings relating to life sciences such as biology, which show higher rates of woman participation than other branches of science and technology."

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A team of lawyers who joined Norton Rose Fulbright from Polsinelli say they were drawn to the firm's global platform
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers say a ruling concerning liability for trademark infringement could give company directors an easy way out and create litigation uncertainty
The LMG Life Sciences Awards announces the winners for the 5th annual awards
Some US lawyers have strengthened their connections with European firms as they help clients determine whether the UPC will become a 'centre of gravity'
In the latest episode, the team discusses the battle to take control of listed company and IP business Qantm IP, and looks at some recent hiring trends
To mark Mental Health Awareness Week, lawyers explain how they manage their mental health, and how they pluck up the courage to ask themselves difficult questions
IP lawyers unpick a case heard at the CJEU’s Grand Chamber this week that could potentially create a new world for litigation in Europe
A lawyer who replied to a cease-and-desist letter with just two words has shown others how to deal with vexatious infringement allegations
The suggested rule change surrounding terminal disclaimers could ease the burden on defendants, but risks complicating prosecution strategies
Gift this article